Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
183_notes:model_of_a_wire [2014/09/25 10:03] – [Modeling the interatomic bond as spring] caballero | 183_notes:model_of_a_wire [2015/09/19 11:27] – [Modeling the solid wire] caballero | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
==== Modeling the interatomic bond as spring ==== | ==== Modeling the interatomic bond as spring ==== | ||
- | [{{ 183_notes: | + | [{{ 183_notes: |
To model the interatomic bond as a spring, we will need to first determine how " | To model the interatomic bond as a spring, we will need to first determine how " | ||
- | $$\rho = 21.45 \dfrac{g}{cm^3} \left(\dfrac{1kg}{10^3g}\right)\left(\dfrac{10^2 cm}{1m}\right)^3 = 21.45 \times 10^3 kg/m^3$$ | + | $$\rho = 21.45 \dfrac{g}{cm^3} \left(\dfrac{1kg}{10^3g}\right)\left(\dfrac{100 cm}{1m}\right)^3 = 21.45 \times 10^3 kg/m^3$$ |
Consider a cubic meter of Pt, which is a cube that is 1m long on each side((This amount of Pt would costs nearly $1, | Consider a cubic meter of Pt, which is a cube that is 1m long on each side((This amount of Pt would costs nearly $1, | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==== Modeling the solid wire ==== | ==== Modeling the solid wire ==== | ||
- | [{{ 183_notes: | + | [{{ 183_notes: |
The simplest model we can use for a wire (beyond a single atomic chain), is to model it as many long parallel chains connected by springs. For you to understand this model, you will need to understand how to model two springs connected end-to-end (in series) and two springs connected side-by-side (in parallel). | The simplest model we can use for a wire (beyond a single atomic chain), is to model it as many long parallel chains connected by springs. For you to understand this model, you will need to understand how to model two springs connected end-to-end (in series) and two springs connected side-by-side (in parallel). | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
$$s = \dfrac{mg}{k} = \dfrac{100N}{100N/ | $$s = \dfrac{mg}{k} = \dfrac{100N}{100N/ | ||
- | When we attach a second 100N/m spring to the end of the first and then attach the mass, the springs | + | Hence, a single 100 N/m spring will stretch precisely 1m when a 100N ball is hung from it. |
+ | |||
+ | When we attach a second 100N/m spring to the end of the first and then attach the mass, both springs | ||
+ | |||
+ | //In series, each spring stretches as if the mass were attached to just that spring//, and the sum of all those stretches gives the overall stretch. | ||
== Modeling two end-to-end springs as one spring (effective spring constant) == | == Modeling two end-to-end springs as one spring (effective spring constant) == | ||
Line 70: | Line 74: | ||
$$s = \dfrac{mg}{2k} = \dfrac{100N}{200N/ | $$s = \dfrac{mg}{2k} = \dfrac{100N}{200N/ | ||
- | When we attach a second 100N/m spring to the ball, the springs both stretch 0.5m. That is, the overall stretch of the spring-mass system is half of what it is with one spring. //In parallel, each spring stretches the same amount//. | + | When we attach a second 100N/m spring to the ball, the springs both stretch 0.5m. That is, the overall stretch of the spring-mass system is half of what it is with one spring. |
+ | |||
+ | //In parallel, each spring stretches the same amount//. | ||
== Modeling two side-by-side springs as one spring (effective spring constant) == | == Modeling two side-by-side springs as one spring (effective spring constant) == | ||
Line 88: | Line 94: | ||
$${k_{s, | $${k_{s, | ||
+ | |||
+ | This way of modeling end-to-end and side-by-side springs will be very useful for modeling [[183_notes: |