Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
184_notes:dq [2017/09/04 18:30] – [$\vec{r}$ - separation vector] tallpaul | 184_notes:dq [2018/09/12 15:22] – dmcpadden | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sections 15.1-15.2 in Matter and Interactions (4th edition) | Sections 15.1-15.2 in Matter and Interactions (4th edition) | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
===== dQ and the $\vec{r}$ ===== | ===== dQ and the $\vec{r}$ ===== | ||
Line 6: | Line 10: | ||
{{youtube> | {{youtube> | ||
==== dQ - Chunks of Charge ==== | ==== dQ - Chunks of Charge ==== | ||
- | When we are splitting the total charge into small pieces of charge, it helps to write the little bit of charge in terms of that shape. For example, if you have a line of charge, writing the charge in terms of the length is useful. If you have a flat disk of charge, writing the charge in terms of the area is useful. If you have a sphere of charge, writing the charge in terms of the volume is useful. This idea of how much charge is in a particular shape (line, area, or volume) is called **charge density**. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | When we are splitting the total charge into small pieces of charge, it helps to write the little bit of charge in terms of that shape. For example, if you have a line of charge, writing the charge in terms of the length is useful. If you have a flat disk of charge, writing the charge in terms of the area is useful. If you have a sphere of charge, writing the charge in terms of the volume is useful. This idea of how much charge is in a particular shape (line, area, or volume) is called **charge density**.[{{ |
+ | |||
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
=== Charge on a line === | === Charge on a line === | ||
Line 14: | Line 19: | ||
For a **1D uniform charge density** (such as lines of charge), we use the variable $\lambda$, which has units of $\frac{C}{m}$ (coulombs per meter). You can calculate $\lambda$ by taking the total charge that is spread over the total length: | For a **1D uniform charge density** (such as lines of charge), we use the variable $\lambda$, which has units of $\frac{C}{m}$ (coulombs per meter). You can calculate $\lambda$ by taking the total charge that is spread over the total length: | ||
$$\lambda=\frac{Q_{tot}}{L_{tot}}$$ | $$\lambda=\frac{Q_{tot}}{L_{tot}}$$ | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | |
Once you have the charge density, you can use this to write your little bit of charge in terms of a little bit of length. | Once you have the charge density, you can use this to write your little bit of charge in terms of a little bit of length. | ||
$$dQ=\lambda dl= \lambda dx = \lambda dy$$ | $$dQ=\lambda dl= \lambda dx = \lambda dy$$ | ||
You can write the " | You can write the " | ||
- | {{184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
=== Charge on a surface === | === Charge on a surface === | ||
Line 37: | Line 42: | ||
Again, you can write the " | Again, you can write the " | ||
- | We will talk more about dAs, dVs and bigger shapes of charge later, but for now we will focus on lines of charge (or 1D charge distributions). | + | We will talk more about dAs, dVs and bigger shapes |
==== Limits on the integral ==== | ==== Limits on the integral ==== | ||
Line 43: | Line 48: | ||
==== $\vec{r}$ - separation vector ==== | ==== $\vec{r}$ - separation vector ==== | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
In general, we have defined the $\vec{r}$ to be the separation vector that points from the source (q or dQ in this case) to the point of interest. If you pick a general point away from the line of charge, such as Point A in the figure, the separation vector can both a) have very different magnitudes and b) point in very different directions for different dQs along the line of charge. This means that we need to come up with a way to write the separation vector that is true for a variety of points along the line. This generally means writing the separation vector in terms of some variable that changes as you move from one dQ to the next along the line. | In general, we have defined the $\vec{r}$ to be the separation vector that points from the source (q or dQ in this case) to the point of interest. If you pick a general point away from the line of charge, such as Point A in the figure, the separation vector can both a) have very different magnitudes and b) point in very different directions for different dQs along the line of charge. This means that we need to come up with a way to write the separation vector that is true for a variety of points along the line. This generally means writing the separation vector in terms of some variable that changes as you move from one dQ to the next along the line. | ||
Line 52: | Line 57: | ||
$$\vec{r}=\langle -d, L-y, 0 \rangle$$ | $$\vec{r}=\langle -d, L-y, 0 \rangle$$ | ||
This way of writing the $\vec{r}$ works for any spot along the piece of tape, and functions like any other vector (we can find its magnitude, unit vector, etc.). Because $\vec{E}$ and $V$ rely heavily on $\vec{r}$ and the $|r|$, we will use this method and reasoning when we are dealing with lines of charge (though this works more generally for planes, spheres, or blobs too). | This way of writing the $\vec{r}$ works for any spot along the piece of tape, and functions like any other vector (we can find its magnitude, unit vector, etc.). Because $\vec{E}$ and $V$ rely heavily on $\vec{r}$ and the $|r|$, we will use this method and reasoning when we are dealing with lines of charge (though this works more generally for planes, spheres, or blobs too). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Examples==== | ||
+ | [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[: |