184_notes:examples:week12_force_between_wires

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
184_notes:examples:week12_force_between_wires [2017/11/07 16:00] – created tallpaul184_notes:examples:week12_force_between_wires [2017/11/07 16:52] tallpaul
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Magnetic Force between Two Current-Carrying Wires ===== ===== Magnetic Force between Two Current-Carrying Wires =====
 +Two parallel wires have currents in opposite directions, $I_1$ and $I_2$. They are situated a distance $R$ from one another. What is the force per length $L$ of one wire on the other?
 +
 +===Facts===
 +  * $I_1$ and $I_2$ exist in opposite directions.
 +  * The two wires are separated by a distance $R$.
 +
 +===Lacking===
 +  * $\vec{F}__{1 \rightarrow 2 \text{, L}}$
 +
 +===Approximations & Assumptions===
 +  * The currents are steady.
 +  * The wires are infinitely long.
 +  * There are no outside forces to consider.
 +
 +===Representations===
 +  * We represent the magnetic field from a very long wire as
 +$$\vec{B}=\frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r} \hat{z}$$
 +  * We represent the magnetic force on a little piece of current as
 +$$\text{d}\vec{F}= I \text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}$$
 +  * We represent the situation with diagram below.
 +
 +{{ 184_notes:12_two_wires_representation.png?400 |Two Wires}}
 +
 +====Solution====
 +We know that the magnetic field at the location of Wire 2 from Wire 1 is given by the magnetic field of a long wire:
 +$$\vec{B}_1=\frac{\mu_0 I_1}{2 \pi r} \hat{z}$$
 +
 +We can reason that the direction of the field is $+\hat{z}$ because of the [[184_notes:rhr|Right Hand Rule]]. We also don't care about the magnetic field from Wire 2 at the location of Wire 2, since Wire 2 cannot exert a force on itself. Now, it remains to calculate the magnetic force.
 +
 +Since we know the magnetic field, the next thing we wish to define is $\text{d}\vec{l}$. Wire 2 has current directed with $\hat{y}$ in our representation, so we can say
 +$$\text{d}\vec{l} = \text{d}y \hat{y}$$
 +
 +This gives
 +$$\text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}_1 = \frac{\mu_0 I_1}{2 \pi r}\text{d}y \hat{x}$$
 +
 +Lastly, we need to choose the limits on our integral. We can select our origin conveniently so that the segment of interest extends from $y=0$ to $y=L$. Now, we write:
 +
 +$$\vec{F}__{1 \rightarrow 2 \text{, L}} = \int_0^L I_2 \text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}_1 = \int_0^L \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2}{2 \pi r}\text{d}y \hat{x} = \frac{\mu_0 I_1 I_2 L}{2 \pi r} \hat{x}$$
 +
 +{{ 184_notes:12_force_per_length.png?500 |Force Per Length}}
 +
 +Notice that this force is repellent. The equal and opposite force of Wire 2 upon Wire 1 would also be repellent. Had the two current been going in the same direction, one can imagine that the two wires would attract each other.
  • 184_notes/examples/week12_force_between_wires.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/07/13 12:16
  • by schram45