Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week12_force_between_wires [2017/11/07 16:12] – tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week12_force_between_wires [2017/11/07 16:52] – tallpaul | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Lacking=== | ===Lacking=== | ||
- | * $\frac{\vec{F}}{L}$ | + | * $\vec{F}__{1 \rightarrow 2 \text{, |
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* We represent the situation with diagram below. | * We represent the situation with diagram below. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes:12_representation.png?500 |Two Wires}} | + | {{ 184_notes:12_two_wires_representation.png?400 |Two Wires}} |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
We know that the magnetic field at the location of Wire 2 from Wire 1 is given by the magnetic field of a long wire: | We know that the magnetic field at the location of Wire 2 from Wire 1 is given by the magnetic field of a long wire: | ||
- | $$\vec{B}=\frac{\mu_0 | + | $$\vec{B}_1=\frac{\mu_0 |
We can reason that the direction of the field is $+\hat{z}$ because of the [[184_notes: | We can reason that the direction of the field is $+\hat{z}$ because of the [[184_notes: | ||
- | We can select a set of coordinates so that the segment | + | Since we know the magnetic field, |
+ | $$\text{d}\vec{l} | ||
- | For now, we write $$\text{d}\vec{l} = \langle | + | This gives |
+ | $$\text{d}\vec{l} | ||
- | We write the $y$-component with a negative sign so that $\text{d}y$ can be positive. For the separation vector, we write | + | Lastly, we need to choose the limits on our integral. |
- | $$\vec{r} = \vec{r}_{obs} - \vec{r}_{source} = \langle 0,0,0 \rangle - \langle x, y, 0 \rangle = \langle -x, -y, 0 \rangle$$ | + | |
- | Notice that we can rewrite | + | $$\vec{F}__{1 \rightarrow 2 \text{, L}} = \int_0^L I_2 \text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{B}_1 |
- | {{ 184_notes:9_dl_breakdown.png?600 |Breakdown of dl-vector}} | + | {{ 184_notes:12_force_per_length.png?500 |Force Per Length}} |
- | We can use geometric arguments to say that $\text{d}y=\text{d}x$. See the diagram above for an insight into this geometric argument. We can now plug in to express $\text{d}\vec{l}$ | + | Notice |
- | $$\text{d}\vec{l} = \langle \text{d}x, -\text{d}x, 0 \rangle$$ | + | |
- | $$\vec{r} = \langle -x, L+x, 0 \rangle$$ | + | |
- | Now, we can take the cross product and find the magnitude of the $\vec{r}$: | + | |
- | $$\text{d}\vec{l} \times \vec{r} = \langle 0, 0, \text{d}x(L+x) - (-\text{d}x)(-x) \rangle = \langle 0, 0, L\text{d}x \rangle = L\text{d}x \hat{z}$$ | + | |
- | $$r^3 = (x^2 + (L+x)^2)^{3/ | + | |
- | The last thing we need is the bounds on our integral. Our variable of integration is $x$, since we chose to express everything | + | |
- | \begin{align*} | + | |
- | \vec{B} &= \int \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{I \cdot d\vec{l}\times \vec{r}}{r^3} \\ | + | |
- | &= \int_{-L}^0 \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{IL\text{d}x}{(x^2 + (L+x)^2)^{3/ | + | |
- | &= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi}\frac{I}{L}\hat{z} | + | |
- | \end{align*} | + |