Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| 184_notes:examples:week5_flux_tilted_surface [2021/05/29 21:03] – schram45 | 184_notes:examples:week5_flux_tilted_surface [2021/05/29 21:07] – [Solution] schram45 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| &= 60\text{ Vm} | &= 60\text{ Vm} | ||
| \end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
| - | This makes sense cause the max flux through the surface would occur when the the surface was perpendicular to the electric field and the area vector was in the same direction as the electric field. This would result in a flux of $120Vm$. Since the surface in this case is $\theta=30^circ\ degrees$ away from the electric field we would expect there to be a much smaller flux die to the large angle between the area vector and the electric field. | + | This makes sense cause the max flux through the surface would occur when the the surface was perpendicular to the electric field and the area vector was in the same direction as the electric field. This would result in a flux of $120Vm$. Since the surface in this case is $30^\circ$ away from the electric field we would expect there to be a much smaller flux due to the large angle between the area vector and the electric field. |