184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2017/10/04 18:58] – [Example: Application of Node Rule] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2018/06/19 15:13] curdemma
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[184_notes:cap_charging|Return to Charging and Discharging Capacitors]]
 +
 =====Looking at a Capacitor as it's Charging===== =====Looking at a Capacitor as it's Charging=====
-I, V, Q over time. +Suppose you have a parallel plate capacitor that is disconnected from any power source and is discharged. At time $t=0$, the capacitor is connected to a batterySketch the graphs of current ($I$) in the wirecharge ($Q$) on the positive plate, and voltage ($\Delta V$) across the capacitor over time.
- +
-Suppose you have the circuit belowNodes are labeled for simplicity of discussion. you are given a few values: $I_1=8 \text{ A}$, $I_2=3 \text{ A}$, and $I_3=4 \text{ A}$. Determine all other currents in the circuit, using the [[184_notes:current#Current_in_Different_Parts_of_the_Wire|Current Node Rule]]. Draw the direction of the current as well. +
- +
-{{ 184_notes:6_nodes.png?300 |Circuit with Nodes}}+
  
 ===Facts=== ===Facts===
-  * $I_1=8 \text{ A}$, $I_2=3 \text{ A}$, and $I_3=4 \text{ A}$+  * The capacitor is discharged
-  * $I_1$, $I_2$, and $I_3are directed as pictured.+  * The capacitor is made up of parallel plates. 
 +  * The capacitor is connected to a power source at $t=0$.
  
 ===Lacking=== ===Lacking===
-  * All other currents (including their directions).+  * Graphs of $I$, $Q$, $\Delta V$.
  
 ===Approximations & Assumptions=== ===Approximations & Assumptions===
-  * The current is not changing (circuit is in steady state). +  * There are no other circuit elements (except for the wire). 
-  * All current in the circuit arises from other currents in the circuit+  * The wire itself has a small resistance, just so we do not have infinite current at $t=0$
-  * No resistance in the battery (approximating the battery as a mechanical battery)+  * Practically speaking, the capacitor becomes "fully charged" (with respect to the potential of the battery) at some finite time.
  
 ===Representations=== ===Representations===
-  * We represent the situation with diagram given. +  * We represent the setup belowThe capacitor is pictured both disconnected and hooked up to the power source. 
-  * We represent the Node Rule as $I_{in}=I_{out}$.+ 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_cap_w_wo_battery.png?500 |Capacitor Setup}}]
  
 ====Solution==== ====Solution====
-Let's start with node $A$. Incoming current is $I_1$, and outgoing current is $I_2$How do we decide if $I_{A\rightarrow B}is incoming or outgoing? We need to bring it back to the Node Rule: $I_{in}=I_{out}$Since $I_1=\text{ A}$ and $I_2=3 \text{ A}$, we need $I_{A\rightarrow B}$ to be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set +Before the capacitor is connected, we know that it is discharged, so there is a net neutral charge both on the wire and on the parallel plates. At time $t=0$, when the power source is connected, it sets up an electric field in the wire (quasi-steady state), which the charges on the wire and capacitor do not immediately oppose, since there is initially no charge on the capacitor. At time $t=0(or maybe slightly after 0once the electric field has propagated at the speed of light), the electric field in the wire may look like this: 
-$$I_{A\rightarrow B} = I_{out}-I_2 = I_{in}-I_2 = I_1-I_2 = 5 \text{ A}$$+ 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_1.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit at time t=0}}] 
 + 
 +Slightly after time $t=0$, charges start to move (setting up a current) and the capacitor begins to charge. Due to the high electric field at the very beginning, the charge flows very quickly at first. Since current is simply the movement of charge, our current graph will start at a very high valueHowever, we expect the current to drop pretty quickly, since the large flow of charge means a quickly charging capacitor. The charges on the capacitor create an electric field that opposes the electric field in the wire and diminishes it, slowing down the flow of charge. A few moments after time $t=0$, the circuit and electric field may look like this: 
 + 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_2.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit a Few Moments after Connection}}] 
 + 
 +During this time, the current is smaller than at the beginning, but it is also decreasing at a slower rate, since the plates are not charging as quickly, which means the electric field is not diminishing as quickly. The current actually decays exponentially, though this is not necessary knowledge for the qualitative graph. Before we produce our graphs, it is also useful to represent the circuit at a time after the capacitor has been "fully charged" (limited by the potential difference of the power source), which was our practical assumption. At this point, the charge on the plates fully opposes the electric field from the power source, and as a result no current exists in the circuit. 
 + 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_3.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit a Long Time after Connection}}] 
 + 
 +Based on what we have argued so far, the graph of the current in the circuit should look something like this: 
 + 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_graph_i.png?400 |Current Graph}}] 
 + 
 +Notice that we also used the charge of the capacitor in our argument for why the current drops off like it doesWe basically argue that the charge graph will look like a flipped current graph: rapidly accumulating charge at first, and gradually slowing down in accumulation until equilibrium ("fully charged"-ness) is reached. This yields the shape below. We are also happy with this result, because current is defined as the rate of change of the charge (amount of charge moving through a checkpoint per unit time). More formally, $\frac{\text{d}Q}{\text{d}t}$. If we know that current is a decaying exponentialthen we can solve the differential equation to find that charge is the opposite of a decaying exponential. You don'need to be able to solve this to know how the charge accumulatesbut it is a nice check that we have been consistent with our reasoning. 
 + 
 +[{{ 184_notes:7_graph_q.png?400 |Charge Graph}}]
  
-We do similar analysis for node $B$Incoming current is $I_{A\rightarrow B}$, and outgoing current is $I_3$. Since $I_{A\rightarrow B}=\textA}$ and $I_3=4 \textA}$we need $I_{B\rightarrow D}$ to be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set +Lastly, we wish to produce a graph of the potential difference between the plates. We can pull from [[184_projects:project_5|previous in-class project]] in which we found the electric field from a large plate of chargeIf the plates are large and close together, the electric field is constant in the middle, and depends on the charge of the plate like so: 
-$$I_{B\rightarrow D} = I_{out}-I_3 = I_{in}-I_3 = I_{A\rightarrow B}-I_3 = 1 \text{ A}$$+$$E_{plate} = \frac{Q_{plate}}{2\epsilon_0 A_{plate}}$
 +Notice that we do not necessarily need to remember this equation -- the electric field of everything we have looked at so far has been directly proportional to the charge (not $Q^2or $Q^5or anything strange).
  
-For node $C$, incoming current is $I_2and $I_3$. There is no outgoing current defined yet! $I_{C\rightarrow D}must be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set +We also remember that potential difference across a constant electric field is just the electric field times the distance: 
-$$I_{C\rightarrow D} = I_{out} = I_{in} = I_2+I_3 = 7 \text{ A}$$+$$\Delta V = E\cdot \Delta d$$ 
 +Since the distance between the plates is unchanging and the electric field simply scales with $Q$, we can expect the voltage graph to have the same shape as the charge graph:
  
-Lastly, we look at node $D$. Incoming current is $I_{B\rightarrow D}$ and $I_{C\rightarrow D}$Since there is no outgoing current defined yet, $I_{D\rightarrow battery}$ must be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set +[{{ 184_notes:7_graph_v.png?400 |Voltage Graph}}]
-$$I_{D\rightarrow battery} = I_{out} = I_{in} = I_{B\rightarrow D}+I_{B\rightarrow D} = 8 \text{ A}$$+
  
-Notice that $I_{D\rightarrow battery}=I_1$. This will always be the case for currents going in and out of the battery (approximating few things that are usually safe to approximate, such as a steady current). In factwe could have treated the battery as another node in this example. Notice also that if you incorrectly reason about the direction of a current (incoming or outgoing), the calculation will give a negative number for the current. The Node Rule is self-correcting. A final diagram with directions is shown below.+That's it! We can even do one more check to be sure we are happy with our result. Notice the the capacitance of a capacitor can be represented as the charge on plate (or something elsedepending on the shape of the capacitor) divided by the potential difference between the plates (or whatever): $$C = \frac{Q}{\Delta V}$$
  
-{{ 184_notes:6_nodes_with_arrows.png?300 |Circuit with Nodes}}+We know that capacitance is a constant, since it is an intrinsic property of the capacitor's structureTherefore, $Q/\Delta V$ must be constant, so their graphs must have the same shape. This is consistent with how we reasoned above, so this check makes us happy.
  • 184_notes/examples/week7_charging_capacitor.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/06/14 23:50
  • by schram45