Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2017/10/06 00:16] – [Looking at a Capacitor as it's Charging] tallpaul
+++ 184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2017/10/06 18:34] – [Solution] tallpaul
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 ===Lacking===
-  * Graphs of $I$, $Q$, $\Delta V$$.
+  * Graphs of $I$, $Q$, $\Delta V$.
 ===Approximations & Assumptions===
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 ====Solution====
-Let's start with node $A$. Incoming current is $I_1$, and outgoing current is $I_2$. How do we decide if $I_{A\rightarrow B}$ is incoming or outgoing? We need to bring it back to the Node Rule: $I_{in}=I_{out}$. Since $I_1=8 \text{ A}$ and $I_2=3 \text{ A}$, we need $I_{A\rightarrow B}$ to be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set
+Before the capacitor is connected, we know that it is discharged, so there is a net neutral charge both on the wire and on the parallel plates. At time $t=0$, when the power source is connected, it brings with it an electric field, which the charges on the wire and capacitor do not immediately oppose, since they have not had time to accumulate. At time $t=0$ (or maybe slightly after 0, once the electric field has propagated at the speed of light), the electric field in the wire may look like this:
-$$I_{A\rightarrow B} = I_{out}-I_2 = I_{in}-I_2 = I_1-I_2 = 5 \text{ A}$$
-We do a similar analysis for node $B$. Incoming current is $I_{A\rightarrow B}$, and outgoing current is $I_3$. Since $I_{A\rightarrow B}=5 \text{ A}$ and $I_3=4 \text{ A}$, we need $I_{B\rightarrow D}$ to be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set
+{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_1.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit at time t=0}}
-$$I_{B\rightarrow D} = I_{out}-I_3 = I_{in}-I_3 = I_{A\rightarrow B}-I_3 = 1 \text{ A}$$
-For node $C$, incoming current is $I_2$ and $I_3$. There is no outgoing current defined yet! $I_{C\rightarrow D}$ must be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set
+Slightly after time $t=0$, current begins to exist and the capacitor begins to charge. Due to the high electric field at the very beginning, the charge flows very quickly at first. Since current is simply the movement of charge, our current graph will start at a very high value. However, we expect the current to drop pretty quickly, since the large flow of charge means a quickly charging capacitor, which begins to oppose the electric field and diminish it, slowing down the flow of charge. A few moments after time $t=0$, the circuit and electric field may look like this:
-$$I_{C\rightarrow D} = I_{out} = I_{in} = I_2+I_3 = 7 \text{ A}$$
-Lastly, we look at node $D$. Incoming current is $I_{B\rightarrow D}$ and $I_{C\rightarrow D}$. Since there is no outgoing current defined yet, $I_{D\rightarrow battery}$ must be outgoing to balance. To satisfy the Node Rule, we set
+{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_2.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit a Few Moments after Connection}}
-$$I_{D\rightarrow battery} = I_{out} = I_{in} = I_{B\rightarrow D}+I_{B\rightarrow D} = 8 \text{ A}$$
-Notice that $I_{D\rightarrow battery}=I_1$. This will always be the case for currents going in and out of the battery (approximating a few things that are usually safe to approximate, such as a steady current). In fact, we could have treated the battery as another node in this example. Notice also that if you incorrectly reason about the direction of a current (incoming or outgoing), the calculation will give a negative number for the current. The Node Rule is self-correcting. A final diagram with directions is shown below.
+During this time, the current is smaller than at the beginning, but it is also decreasing at a slower rate, since the plates are not charging as quickly, which means the electric field is not diminishing as quickly. The current actually decays exponentially, though this is not necessary knowledge for the qualitative graph. Before we produce our graphs, it is also useful to represent the circuit at a time after the capacitor has been "fully charged" (limited by the potential difference of the power source), which was our practical assumption. At this point, the charge on the plates fully opposes the electric field from the power source, and as a result no current exists in the circuit.
-{{ 184_notes:6_nodes_with_arrows.png?300 |Circuit with Nodes}}
+{{ 184_notes:7_cap_time_3.png?300 |Capacitor Circuit a Long Time after Connection}}
+Based on what we have argued so far, the graph of the current in the circuit should look something like this:
+{{ 184_notes:7_graph_i.png?400 |Current Graph}}
+Notice that we also used the charge of the capacitor in our argument for why the current drops off like it does. We basically argue that the charge graph will look like a flipped current graph: rapidly accumulating charge at first, and gradually slowing down in accumulation until equilibrium ("fully charged"-ness) is reached. This yields the shape below. We are also happy with this result, because current is defined as the rate of change of the charge (amount of charge moving through a checkpoint per unit time). More formally, $I = \frac{\text{d}Q}{\text{d}t}$. If we know that current is a decaying exponential, then we can solve the differential equation to find that charge is the opposite of a decaying exponential. You don't need to be able to solve this to know how the charge accumulates, but it is a nice check that we have been consistent with our reasoning.
+{{ 184_notes:7_graph_q.png?400 |Charge Graph}}
+Lastly, we wish to produce a graph of the potential difference between the plates. We can pull from a previous in-class project in which we found the electric field from a large plate of charge. It is pretty much constant, and depends on the charge of the plate like so:
+$$E_{plate} = \frac{Q_{plate}}{2\epsilon_0 A_{plate}}$$
+Notice that we do not necessarily need to remember this equation -- the electric field of everything we have looked at so far depends linearly on the charge.
+We also remember that potential difference across a constant electric field is just the electric field times the distance. Since the distance between the plates is unchanging and the electric field simply scales with $Q$, we can expect the voltage graph to have the same shape as the charge graph:
+{{ 184_notes:7_graph_v.png?400 |Voltage Graph}}
+That's it! We can even do one more check to be sure we are happy with our result. Notice the the capacitance of a capacitor can be represented as the charge on a plate (or something else, depending on the shape of the capacitor) divided by the potential difference between the plates (or whatever): $$C = \frac{Q}{\Delta V}$$
+We know that capacitance is a constant, since it is an intrinsic property of the capacitor's structure. Therefore, $Q/\Delta V$ must be constant, so their graphs must have the same shape. This is consistent with how we reasoned above, so this check makes us happy.