184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2017/10/06 18:29] – [Solution] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week7_charging_capacitor [2017/10/06 18:34] – [Solution] tallpaul
Line 37: Line 37:
 {{ 184_notes:7_graph_i.png?400 |Current Graph}} {{ 184_notes:7_graph_i.png?400 |Current Graph}}
  
-Notice that we also used the charge of the capacitor in our argument for why the current drops off like it does. We basically argue that the charge graph will look like a flipped current graph: rapidly accumulating charge at first, and gradually slowing down in accumulation until equilibrium ("fully charged"-ness) is reached. This yields the shape below. We are also happy with this result, because current is defined as the rate of change of the charge (amount of charge moving through a checkpoint per unit time). More formally, $I = \frac{\text{d}Q}{\text{d}t}$. If we know that current is a decaying exponential, then we can solve the rather differential equation to find that charge is the opposite of a decaying exponential. You don't need to be able to solve this to know how the charge accumulates, but it is a nice check that we have been consistent with our reasoning.+Notice that we also used the charge of the capacitor in our argument for why the current drops off like it does. We basically argue that the charge graph will look like a flipped current graph: rapidly accumulating charge at first, and gradually slowing down in accumulation until equilibrium ("fully charged"-ness) is reached. This yields the shape below. We are also happy with this result, because current is defined as the rate of change of the charge (amount of charge moving through a checkpoint per unit time). More formally, $I = \frac{\text{d}Q}{\text{d}t}$. If we know that current is a decaying exponential, then we can solve the differential equation to find that charge is the opposite of a decaying exponential. You don't need to be able to solve this to know how the charge accumulates, but it is a nice check that we have been consistent with our reasoning.
  
 {{ 184_notes:7_graph_q.png?400 |Charge Graph}} {{ 184_notes:7_graph_q.png?400 |Charge Graph}}
Line 43: Line 43:
 Lastly, we wish to produce a graph of the potential difference between the plates. We can pull from a previous in-class project in which we found the electric field from a large plate of charge. It is pretty much constant, and depends on the charge of the plate like so: Lastly, we wish to produce a graph of the potential difference between the plates. We can pull from a previous in-class project in which we found the electric field from a large plate of charge. It is pretty much constant, and depends on the charge of the plate like so:
 $$E_{plate} = \frac{Q_{plate}}{2\epsilon_0 A_{plate}}$$ $$E_{plate} = \frac{Q_{plate}}{2\epsilon_0 A_{plate}}$$
 +Notice that we do not necessarily need to remember this equation -- the electric field of everything we have looked at so far depends linearly on the charge.
 +
 We also remember that potential difference across a constant electric field is just the electric field times the distance. Since the distance between the plates is unchanging and the electric field simply scales with $Q$, we can expect the voltage graph to have the same shape as the charge graph: We also remember that potential difference across a constant electric field is just the electric field times the distance. Since the distance between the plates is unchanging and the electric field simply scales with $Q$, we can expect the voltage graph to have the same shape as the charge graph:
  
  • 184_notes/examples/week7_charging_capacitor.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/06/14 23:50
  • by schram45