Example: Sledding
A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground?
Facts
Child on incline of θ.
The total mass of the sled and child = m.
There's a small bit of friction between the rails of the sled and the snow = (μ_k).
Slope length = L
Initial state: at rest, at height above horizontal
Final state: at rest on horizontal
Lacking
How far will she travel along the flat?
Approximations & Assumptions
Coefficient for kinetic friction for flat + incline is the same.
No wind resistance.
Representations
Solution
We could solve this using forces of kinematics; but, let's apply the energy principle because we can avoid vector quantities in the calculation.
First we must decide the system and surroundings.
System: Sled+Kid+Earth Surroundings: Snow
Starting with the principle that change in energy in the system is equal to the work done by the surroundings.
ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings
The change in energy can be in the form of change of kinetic and change in gravitational potential energy.
ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction
No change ΔK=0 as its initial and final state of the sled is at rest.
ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction?
Here, we pause because we have two different regions to consider.
The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately.
ΔUg=W1+W2
Breaking work down into force by change in distance.
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2
→r2 is what we are trying to solve for as this is the position change along flat part.
What's f1 and f2?
Need to find f1 & f2
To find F1 we can say that the sum of the forces in the x direction are equal to ma1 But we don't need this because we know that f_{1}=μ_{k}N.
\sum{F_{x}} = f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1}
The sum of the forces in the y direction we do need because this allows us to express N.
\sum{F_{y}} = N - mgcosθ = 0
mgcosθ = N
If f_{1}=μ_{k}N then:
f_{1} = μ_{k}mgcosθ
To find f_{2} we must do the same thing and add all the forces in the x and y directions. Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations and instead want an equation that expresses f_{2}.
\sum{F_{x}} = f_{2} = ma_{2} \longrightarrow f_{2} = μ_{k}N = μ_{k}mg
\sum{F_{y}} = N-mg = 0
We substitute in for f_{1}, f_{2} and d the distance down the slope into the previous equation for gravitational potential energy with minuses on the \vec{f}'s as they are in opposition of the \vec{r}'s.
\Delta U_{g} = \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} + \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2}
In the previous equation \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} \longrightarrow W_{1}<0 and \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2} \longrightarrow W_{2}<0 because \vec{f}'s are opposite to \Delta \vec{r}'s
\Delta U_{g} = -(μ_{k}mgcosθ)d - (μ_{k}mg)x
Substitute in the equation for gravitational potential energy for \Delta U_{g}
+mg(y_f - y_i) = -μ_{k}mgdcosθ - μ_{k}mgx
Rearrange to get the following expression.
y_f - y_i = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x)
What is y_f-y_i in terms of what we know? Eventually we want to express x in terms of variables we know.
From the diagram of the incline we get:
y_f-y_i = -dsinθ
Substitue -dsinθ for y_f-y_i and then rearrange to express x in terms of known variables.
-dsinθ = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x)
dcosθ+x = \dfrac{d}{μ_{k}}sinθ
x = \dfrac{d}{μ_{k}}sinθ - dcosθ
x = d (\dfrac{sinθ-μ_{k}cosθ}{μ_{k}})
A check of the units reveals that:
[x]=m
[d]=m
Which makes sense as all the other quantities are unit less.
E = γmc^2