Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week5_flux_two_radii [2017/09/25 13:11] – [Solution] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week5_flux_two_radii [2021/06/04 00:47] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
=====Example: | =====Example: | ||
Suppose you have a point charge with value $1 \mu\text{C}$. What are the fluxes through two spherical shells centered at the point charge, one with radius $3 \text{ cm}$ and the other with radius $6 \text{ cm}$? | Suppose you have a point charge with value $1 \mu\text{C}$. What are the fluxes through two spherical shells centered at the point charge, one with radius $3 \text{ cm}$ and the other with radius $6 \text{ cm}$? | ||
Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
* $\Phi_e$ for each sphere | * $\Phi_e$ for each sphere | ||
* $\text{d}\vec{A}$ or $\vec{A}$, if necessary | * $\text{d}\vec{A}$ or $\vec{A}$, if necessary | ||
- | |||
- | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * There are no other charges that contribute appreciably to the flux calculation. | ||
- | * There is no background electric field. | ||
- | * The electric fluxes through the spherical shells are due only to the point charge. | ||
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
Line 21: | Line 18: | ||
$$\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{r}$$ | $$\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{r}$$ | ||
* We represent the situation with the following diagram. Note that the circles are indeed spherical shells, not rings as they appear. | * We represent the situation with the following diagram. Note that the circles are indeed spherical shells, not rings as they appear. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
+ | There are a few approximations and assumptions we should make in order to simplify our model. | ||
+ | * There are no other charges that contribute appreciably to the flux calculation. | ||
+ | * There is no background electric field. | ||
+ | * The electric fluxes through the spherical shells are due only to the point charge. | ||
+ | The first three assumptions ensure that there is nothing else contributing or affecting the flux through our spheres in the model. | ||
+ | * Perfect spheres: This will simplify our area vectors and allows us to use geometric equations for spheres in our calculations. | ||
+ | * Constant charge for the point charge: Ensures that the point charge is not charging or discharging with time. | ||
+ | </ | ||
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
Before we dive into calculations, | Before we dive into calculations, | ||
- | {{184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
- | FIXME (Quick something about why the dot product simplifies) | + | Since the shell is a fixed distance from the point charge, the electric field has constant magnitude on the shell. |
$$\Phi_e=\int\vec{E}\bullet \text{d}\vec{A} = E\int\text{d}A$$ | $$\Phi_e=\int\vec{E}\bullet \text{d}\vec{A} = E\int\text{d}A$$ | ||
- | FIXME (You could use this to justify why E is constant on area) We can rewrite | + | Note that $E$ is a scalar value representing $\vec{E}$ as a magnitude, |
$$E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\left|\hat{r}\right| = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}$$ | $$E = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\left|\hat{r}\right| = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}$$ |