Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/11 06:20] – pwirving | 183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/22 04:06] (current) – pwirving | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Example: | + | ===== Example: |
A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground? | A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground? | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=== Solution === | === Solution === | ||
+ | |||
+ | We could solve this using forces of kinematics; but, let's apply the energy principle because we can avoid vector quantities in the calculation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | First we must decide the system and surroundings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | System: Sled+Kid+Earth | ||
+ | Surroundings: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Starting with the principle that change in energy in the system is equal to the work done by the surroundings. | ||
ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings | ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings | ||
+ | |||
+ | The change in energy can be in the form of change of kinetic and change in gravitational potential energy. | ||
ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction | ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction | ||
- | no change ΔK=0 | + | No change ΔK=0 as its initial and final state of the sled is at rest. |
ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction? | ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction? | ||
Line 51: | Line 62: | ||
Here, we pause because we have two different regions to consider. | Here, we pause because we have two different regions to consider. | ||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately. | The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately. | ||
ΔUg=W1+W2 | ΔUg=W1+W2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Breaking work down into force by change in distance. | ||
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ||
- | →r2 is what we care about. (position change along flat part) | + | →r2 is what we are trying to solve for as this is the position change along flat part. |
What's f1 and f2? | What's f1 and f2? | ||
- | $\sum{F_{x}} = f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1} | + | {{course_planning: |
+ | |||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Need to find $f_{1}&f_{2}$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find F1 we can say that the sum of the forces in the x direction are equal to $ma_{1}$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | \sum{F_{x}} = f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1} | ||
+ | |||
+ | The sum of the forces in the y direction we do need because this allows us to express N. | ||
\sum{F_{y}} = N - mgcosθ = 0 | \sum{F_{y}} = N - mgcosθ = 0 | ||
mgcosθ = N | mgcosθ = N | ||
+ | |||
+ | If f_{1}=μ_{k}N then: | ||
f_{1} = μ_{k}mgcosθ | f_{1} = μ_{k}mgcosθ | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find f_{2} we must do the same thing and add all the forces in the x and y directions. Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations and instead want an equation that expresses f_{2}. | ||
\sum{F_{x}} = f_{2} = ma_{2} \longrightarrow f_{2} = μ_{k}N = μ_{k}mg | \sum{F_{x}} = f_{2} = ma_{2} \longrightarrow f_{2} = μ_{k}N = μ_{k}mg | ||
Line 75: | Line 104: | ||
\sum{F_{y}} = N-mg = 0 | \sum{F_{y}} = N-mg = 0 | ||
- | Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations. | + | We substitute in for f_{1}, f_{2} and d the distance down the slope into the previous equation for gravitational potential energy with minuses on the $\vec{f}'s as they are in opposition of the \vec{r}' |
\Delta U_{g} = \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} + \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2} | \Delta U_{g} = \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} + \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2} | ||
Line 82: | Line 111: | ||
\Delta U_{g} = -(μ_{k}mgcosθ)d - (μ_{k}mg)x | \Delta U_{g} = -(μ_{k}mgcosθ)d - (μ_{k}mg)x | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substitute in the equation for gravitational potential energy for \Delta U_{g} | ||
+mg(y_f - y_i) = -μ_{k}mgdcosθ - μ_{k}mgx | +mg(y_f - y_i) = -μ_{k}mgdcosθ - μ_{k}mgx | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rearrange to get the following expression. | ||
y_f - y_i = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) | y_f - y_i = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) | ||
- | What is y_f-y_i in terms of what we know? | + | What is y_f-y_i in terms of what we know? Eventually we want to express x in terms of variables we know. |
+ | |||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the diagram of the incline we get: | ||
y_f-y_i = -dsinθ | y_f-y_i = -dsinθ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substitue -dsinθ for y_f-y_i and then rearrange to express x in terms of known variables. | ||
-dsinθ = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) | -dsinθ = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) | ||
Line 98: | Line 137: | ||
x = d (\dfrac{sinθ-μ_{k}cosθ}{μ_{k}}) | x = d (\dfrac{sinθ-μ_{k}cosθ}{μ_{k}}) | ||
+ | |||
+ | A check of the units reveals that: | ||
[x]=m | [x]=m | ||
Line 103: | Line 144: | ||
[d]=m | [d]=m | ||
- | All other quantities are unitless. | + | Which makes sense as all the other quantities are unit less. |
+ | E = γmc^2 |