Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/11 06:42] – pwirving | 183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/22 04:06] (current) – pwirving | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Example: | + | ===== Example: |
A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground? | A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground? | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
=== Solution === | === Solution === | ||
+ | |||
+ | We could solve this using forces of kinematics; but, let's apply the energy principle because we can avoid vector quantities in the calculation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | First we must decide the system and surroundings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | System: Sled+Kid+Earth | ||
+ | Surroundings: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Starting with the principle that change in energy in the system is equal to the work done by the surroundings. | ||
ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings | ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings | ||
+ | |||
+ | The change in energy can be in the form of change of kinetic and change in gravitational potential energy. | ||
ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction | ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction | ||
- | no change ΔK=0 | + | No change ΔK=0 as its initial and final state of the sled is at rest. |
ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction? | ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction? | ||
Line 53: | Line 64: | ||
{{course_planning: | {{course_planning: | ||
- | {{course_planning: | + | {{course_planning: |
The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately. | The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately. | ||
ΔUg=W1+W2 | ΔUg=W1+W2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Breaking work down into force by change in distance. | ||
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ||
- | →r2 is what we care about. (position change along flat part) | + | →r2 is what we are trying to solve for as this is the position change along flat part. |
What's f1 and f2? | What's f1 and f2? | ||
- | $\sum{F_{x}} = f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1} | + | {{course_planning: |
+ | |||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Need to find $f_{1}&f_{2}$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find F1 we can say that the sum of the forces in the x direction are equal to $ma_{1}$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ∑Fx=f1−mgsinθ=ma1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | The sum of the forces in the y direction we do need because this allows us to express N. | ||
∑Fy=N−mgcosθ=0 | ∑Fy=N−mgcosθ=0 | ||
mgcosθ=N | mgcosθ=N | ||
+ | |||
+ | If f1=μkN then: | ||
f1=μkmgcosθ | f1=μkmgcosθ | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find f2 we must do the same thing and add all the forces in the x and y directions. Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations and instead want an equation that expresses f2. | ||
∑Fx=f2=ma2⟶f2=μkN=μkmg | ∑Fx=f2=ma2⟶f2=μkN=μkmg | ||
Line 77: | Line 104: | ||
∑Fy=N−mg=0 | ∑Fy=N−mg=0 | ||
- | Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations. | + | We substitute in for f1, f2 and d the distance down the slope into the previous equation for gravitational potential energy with minuses on the $\vec{f}'sastheyareinoppositionofthe\vec{r}' |
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2 | ||
Line 84: | Line 111: | ||
ΔUg=−(μkmgcosθ)d−(μkmg)x | ΔUg=−(μkmgcosθ)d−(μkmg)x | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substitute in the equation for gravitational potential energy for ΔUg | ||
+mg(yf−yi)=−μkmgdcosθ−μkmgx | +mg(yf−yi)=−μkmgdcosθ−μkmgx | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rearrange to get the following expression. | ||
yf−yi=−μk(dcosθ+x) | yf−yi=−μk(dcosθ+x) | ||
- | What is yf−yi in terms of what we know? | + | What is yf−yi in terms of what we know? Eventually we want to express x in terms of variables we know. |
+ | |||
+ | {{course_planning: | ||
+ | |||
+ | From the diagram of the incline we get: | ||
yf−yi=−dsinθ | yf−yi=−dsinθ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Substitue −dsinθ for yf−yi and then rearrange to express x in terms of known variables. | ||
−dsinθ=−μk(dcosθ+x) | −dsinθ=−μk(dcosθ+x) | ||
Line 100: | Line 137: | ||
x=d(sinθ−μkcosθμk) | x=d(sinθ−μkcosθμk) | ||
+ | |||
+ | A check of the units reveals that: | ||
[x]=m | [x]=m | ||
Line 105: | Line 144: | ||
[d]=m | [d]=m | ||
- | All other quantities are unitless. | + | Which makes sense as all the other quantities are unit less. |
+ | E=γmc2 |