183_notes:examples:sledding

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/11 06:43] pwirving183_notes:examples:sledding [2014/10/22 04:06] (current) pwirving
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== Example: The Jumper =====+===== Example: Sledding =====
  
 A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground? A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground?
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 === Solution === === Solution ===
 +
 +We could solve this using forces of kinematics; but, let's apply the energy principle because we can avoid vector quantities in the calculation.
 +
 +First we must decide the system and surroundings.
 +
 +System: Sled+Kid+Earth
 +Surroundings: Snow
 +
 +Starting with the principle that change in energy in the system is equal to the work done by the surroundings.
  
 ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings
 +
 +The change in energy can be in the form of change of kinetic and change in gravitational potential energy.
  
 ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction
  
-no change ΔK=0+No change ΔK=0 as its initial and final state of the sled is at rest.
  
 ΔUg=WfrictionWfriction? ΔUg=WfrictionWfriction?
Line 58: Line 69:
  
 ΔUg=W1+W2 ΔUg=W1+W2
 +
 +Breaking work down into force by change in distance.
  
 ΔUg=f1Δr1+f2Δr2 ΔUg=f1Δr1+f2Δr2
  
-r2 is what we care about. (position change along flat part)+r2 is what we are trying to solve for as this is the position change along flat part.
  
 What's f1 and f2? What's f1 and f2?
  
-$\sum{F_{x}} f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1} \longrightarrowdontneedthisbecausef_{1}=μ_{k}N$+{{course_planning:course_notes:f1a.jpg?200|}} 
 + 
 +{{course_planning:projects:f2b.jpg?200|}} 
 + 
 +Need to find $f_{1}&f_{2}$ 
 + 
 +To find F1 we can say that the sum of the forces in the x direction are equal to $ma_{1}$ But we don't need this because we know that f_{1}=μ_{k}N
 + 
 +\sum{F_{x}} = f_{1} - mgsinθ = ma_{1}  
 + 
 +The sum of the forces in the y direction we do need because this allows us to express N.
  
 \sum{F_{y}} = N - mgcosθ = 0 \sum{F_{y}} = N - mgcosθ = 0
  
 mgcosθ = N mgcosθ = N
 +
 +If f_{1}=μ_{k}N then:
  
 f_{1} = μ_{k}mgcosθ f_{1} = μ_{k}mgcosθ
 +
 +To find f_{2} we must do the same thing and add all the forces in the x and y directions. Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations and instead want an equation that expresses f_{2}.
  
 \sum{F_{x}} = f_{2} = ma_{2} \longrightarrow f_{2} = μ_{k}N = μ_{k}mg \sum{F_{x}} = f_{2} = ma_{2} \longrightarrow f_{2} = μ_{k}N = μ_{k}mg
Line 77: Line 104:
 \sum{F_{y}} = N-mg = 0 \sum{F_{y}} = N-mg = 0
  
-Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations.+We substitute in for f_{1}, f_{2} and d the distance down the slope into the previous equation for gravitational potential energy with minuses on the $\vec{f}'s as they are in opposition of the \vec{r}'s$.
  
 \Delta U_{g} = \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} + \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2} \Delta U_{g} = \vec{f}_{1}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{1} + \vec{f}_{2}\cdot\Delta \vec{r}_{2}
Line 84: Line 111:
  
 \Delta U_{g} = -(μ_{k}mgcosθ)d - (μ_{k}mg)x \Delta U_{g} = -(μ_{k}mgcosθ)d - (μ_{k}mg)x
 +
 +Substitute in the equation for gravitational potential energy for \Delta U_{g}
  
 +mg(y_f - y_i) = -μ_{k}mgdcosθ - μ_{k}mgx +mg(y_f - y_i) = -μ_{k}mgdcosθ - μ_{k}mgx
 +
 +Rearrange to get the following expression.
  
 y_f - y_i = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) y_f - y_i = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x)
  
-What is y_f-y_i in terms of what we know?+What is y_f-y_i in terms of what we know? Eventually we want to express x in terms of variables we know. 
 + 
 +{{course_planning:course_notes:final_sledding.jpg?200|}} 
 + 
 +From the diagram of the incline we get:
  
 y_f-y_i =  -dsinθ y_f-y_i =  -dsinθ
 +
 +Substitue -dsinθ for y_f-y_i and then rearrange to express x in terms of known variables.
  
 -dsinθ = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x) -dsinθ = -μ_{k}(dcosθ + x)
Line 100: Line 137:
  
 x = d (\dfrac{sinθ-μ_{k}cosθ}{μ_{k}}) x = d (\dfrac{sinθ-μ_{k}cosθ}{μ_{k}})
 +
 +A check of the units reveals that:
  
 [x]=m [x]=m
Line 105: Line 144:
 [d]=m [d]=m
  
-All other quantities are unitless. +Which makes sense as all the other quantities are unit less.
  
  
 +E = γmc^2
  • 183_notes/examples/sledding.1413009802.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2014/10/11 06:43
  • by pwirving