Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week10_current_segment [2017/10/29 20:03] – created tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week10_current_segment [2021/07/07 18:01] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
=====Magnetic Field from a Current Segment===== | =====Magnetic Field from a Current Segment===== | ||
- | You may have read about how to find the [[184_notes: | + | The notes outline |
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * The current is steady, and the wire segment is uniform. | + | * The current is steady: This means the current is not changing with time or space through our segment |
+ | * The segment is straight and uniform: This will simplify down our model to where the segment only extends in a single direction, simplifying the separation vector. Also, assuming | ||
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
Below, we show a diagram with a lot of pieces of the Biot-Savart Law unpacked. We show an example d→l, | Below, we show a diagram with a lot of pieces of the Biot-Savart Law unpacked. We show an example d→l, | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
- | For now, we write d→l=⟨dx,dy,0⟩ | + | For now, we write $$\text{d}\vec{l} = \langle \text{d}x, |
- | and →r=→robs−→rsource=0−⟨x,y,0⟩=⟨−x,−y,0⟩ | + | |
- | Notice that we can rewrite y as $y=-L-x$. This is a little tricky to arrive at, but is necessary to figure out unless you rotate your coordinate axes, which would be an alternative | + | We write the y-component with a negative sign so that dy can be positive. For the separation vector, we write |
+ | $$\vec{r} = \vec{r}_{obs} - \vec{r}_{source} = \langle | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that we can rewrite y as $y=-x-L$. This equation comes from the equation for a straight line, y=mx+b, where the slope of the line (or wire in this case) is m=−1 and the y-intercept of the wire is at b=−L. An alternate | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can use geometric arguments | ||
d→l=⟨dx,−dx,0⟩ | d→l=⟨dx,−dx,0⟩ | ||
→r=⟨−x,L+x,0⟩ | →r=⟨−x,L+x,0⟩ | ||
- | Now, a couple other quantities that we see will be useful: | + | Now, we can take the cross product and find the magnitude of the →r: |
d→l×→r=⟨0,0,dx(L+x)−(−dx)(−x)⟩=⟨0,0,Ldx⟩=Ldxˆz | d→l×→r=⟨0,0,dx(L+x)−(−dx)(−x)⟩=⟨0,0,Ldx⟩=Ldxˆz | ||
r3=(x2+(L+x)2)3/2 | r3=(x2+(L+x)2)3/2 | ||
- | The last thing we need is the bounds on our integral. Our variable of integration is x, since we chose to express everything in terms of x and dx. | + | The last thing we need is the bounds on our integral. Our variable of integration is x, since we chose to express everything in terms of x and dx. |
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
\vec{B} &= \int \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{I \cdot d\vec{l}\times \vec{r}}{r^3} \\ | \vec{B} &= \int \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{I \cdot d\vec{l}\times \vec{r}}{r^3} \\ | ||
Line 39: | Line 49: | ||
&= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi}\frac{I}{L}\hat{z} | &= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi}\frac{I}{L}\hat{z} | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | You can try to do this by adjusting your x-y coordinate system as well (this is in the example video), and you will get the exact same solution. This is a great way to get some practice solving these problems and it gives you other solutions to check your answer with. |