184_notes:examples:week10_current_segment

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week10_current_segment [2017/11/03 17:08] – [Solution] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week10_current_segment [2021/07/07 18:01] (current) – schram45
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[184_notes:b_current|Return to Currents make Magnetic Fields notes]]
 +
 =====Magnetic Field from a Current Segment===== =====Magnetic Field from a Current Segment=====
 The notes outline how to find the [[184_notes:b_current#Magnetic_Field_from_a_Very_Long_Wire|magnetic field from a very long wire of current]]. Now, what is the magnetic field from a single segment? Suppose we have the configuration shown below. Your observation point is at the origin, and the segment of current I runs in a straight line from ⟨−L,0,0⟩ to ⟨0,−L,0⟩. The notes outline how to find the [[184_notes:b_current#Magnetic_Field_from_a_Very_Long_Wire|magnetic field from a very long wire of current]]. Now, what is the magnetic field from a single segment? Suppose we have the configuration shown below. Your observation point is at the origin, and the segment of current I runs in a straight line from ⟨−L,0,0⟩ to ⟨0,−L,0⟩.
  
-{{ 184_notes:9_current_segment_bare.png?200 |Segment of Current}}+[{{ 184_notes:9_current_segment_bare.png?200 |Segment of Current}}]
  
 ===Facts=== ===Facts===
Line 13: Line 15:
  
 ===Approximations & Assumptions=== ===Approximations & Assumptions===
-  * The current is steady, and the wire segment is uniform.+  * The current is steady: This means the current is not changing with time or space through our segment and is just a constant. 
 +  * The segment is straight and uniform: This will simplify down our model to where the segment only extends in a single direction, simplifying the separation vector. Also, assuming the segment is uniform (in properties and dimensions) means the current in the segment will be constant, as any discontinuities could have effects on the current.
  
 ===Representations=== ===Representations===
Line 23: Line 26:
 Below, we show a diagram with a lot of pieces of the Biot-Savart Law unpacked. We show an example d→l, and a separation vector →r. Notice that d→l is directed along the segment, in the same direction as the current. The separation vector →r points as always from source to observation. Below, we show a diagram with a lot of pieces of the Biot-Savart Law unpacked. We show an example d→l, and a separation vector →r. Notice that d→l is directed along the segment, in the same direction as the current. The separation vector →r points as always from source to observation.
  
-{{ 184_notes:9_current_segment.png?400 |Segment of Current}}+[{{ 184_notes:9_current_segment.png?400 |Segment of Current}}]
  
 For now, we write d→l=⟨dx,−dy,0⟩
 For now, we write d→l=⟨dx,−dy,0⟩
Line 32: Line 35:
 Notice that we can rewrite y as y=−x−L. This equation comes from the equation for a straight line, y=mx+b, where the slope of the line (or wire in this case) is m=−1 and the y-intercept of the wire is at b=−L. An alternate solution to this example could also be to rotate the coordinate system so that the x or y axis lines up with wire. If finding y is troublesome, it may be helpful to rotate your coordinate axes. Notice that we can rewrite y as y=−x−L. This equation comes from the equation for a straight line, y=mx+b, where the slope of the line (or wire in this case) is m=−1 and the y-intercept of the wire is at b=−L. An alternate solution to this example could also be to rotate the coordinate system so that the x or y axis lines up with wire. If finding y is troublesome, it may be helpful to rotate your coordinate axes.
  
-{{ 184_notes:9_dl_breakdown.png?600 |Breakdown of dl-vector}}+[{{ 184_notes:9_dl_breakdown.png?600 |Breakdown of dl-vector}}]
  
 We can use geometric arguments to say that dy=dx. See the diagram above for an insight into this geometric argument. We can now plug in to express d→l and →r in terms of x and dx: We can use geometric arguments to say that dy=dx. See the diagram above for an insight into this geometric argument. We can now plug in to express d→l and →r in terms of x and dx:
Line 46: Line 49:
         &= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi}\frac{I}{L}\hat{z}         &= \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi}\frac{I}{L}\hat{z}
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
 +
 +You can try to do this by adjusting your x-y coordinate system as well (this is in the example video), and you will get the exact same solution. This is a great way to get some practice solving these problems and it gives you other solutions to check your answer with.
  • 184_notes/examples/week10_current_segment.1509728920.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2017/11/03 17:08
  • by tallpaul