Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week10_helix [2017/11/02 21:31] – dmcpadden | 184_notes:examples:week10_helix [2021/07/07 15:42] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
=====Helical Motion in a Magnetic Field===== | =====Helical Motion in a Magnetic Field===== | ||
Suppose you have a moving charge q=20 mC in a magnetic field →B=15 mT ˆy. The charge has a velocity of →v=(3ˆx+2ˆy) m/s, and a mass of m=1 g. What does the motion of the charge look like? | Suppose you have a moving charge q=20 mC in a magnetic field →B=15 mT ˆy. The charge has a velocity of →v=(3ˆx+2ˆy) m/s, and a mass of m=1 g. What does the motion of the charge look like? | ||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
* The B-field is constant. | * The B-field is constant. | ||
+ | * Charge and Mass of the particle are constant. | ||
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
* We represent the situation below. | * We represent the situation below. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
Line 28: | Line 31: | ||
So it seems like the motion here will not be circular. The magnetic force still plays a role, though because the velocity also has an x-component. From the magnetic force equation, we find that the magnetic force would be: | So it seems like the motion here will not be circular. The magnetic force still plays a role, though because the velocity also has an x-component. From the magnetic force equation, we find that the magnetic force would be: | ||
→F=q→v×→B==q(vxˆx+vyˆy)×(Bˆy)=qvxBˆz | →F=q→v×→B==q(vxˆx+vyˆy)×(Bˆy)=qvxBˆz | ||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | ===Assumptions=== | ||
+ | Our assumptions about the Constant B-Field and chrage are essential in simplifying down the force equation. If these assumptions were not true out force could also have some time and space dependency which would make solving for and predicting the force much more dificult. | ||
+ | </ | ||
This force would still push the particle into a circular motion (while still not affecting the particle' | This force would still push the particle into a circular motion (while still not affecting the particle' | ||
So when we look at the motion of the particle from the perspective of +y going into the page, we should see a circle with radius | So when we look at the motion of the particle from the perspective of +y going into the page, we should see a circle with radius | ||
r=mvxqB=10 m | r=mvxqB=10 m | ||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | ===Assumption=== | ||
+ | We assumed the mass was constant, and this allows for uniform circular motion in the x-z plane. If the mass were not constant then the path of the particle could look much different as the radius of curvature of the particle at any instance in time/space could change. | ||
+ | </ | ||
However, because of the constant ˆy component of the velocity, this circle is actually a helix. Two perspectives show the motion below. | However, because of the constant ˆy component of the velocity, this circle is actually a helix. Two perspectives show the motion below. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |