Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week12_decreasing_flux [2017/11/10 16:53] – [Solution] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week12_decreasing_flux [2018/08/09 18:46] (current) – curdemma | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
===== Decreasing Flux ===== | ===== Decreasing Flux ===== | ||
Say we have a bar that is sliding down a pair of connected conductive rails (so current is free to flow through the loop created by the bar and rails), which is sitting in a magnetic field that points into the page. If the bar slides along the rails to decrease the area of the loop, what happens? | Say we have a bar that is sliding down a pair of connected conductive rails (so current is free to flow through the loop created by the bar and rails), which is sitting in a magnetic field that points into the page. If the bar slides along the rails to decrease the area of the loop, what happens? | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
* We represent the steps with the following visual: | * We represent the steps with the following visual: | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
Since the magnetic field has a uniform direction, and the area of the loop is flat (meaning d→A does not change direction if we move along the area), then we can simplify the dot product: | Since the magnetic field has a uniform direction, and the area of the loop is flat (meaning d→A does not change direction if we move along the area), then we can simplify the dot product: | ||
Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
∫BdAcosθ=Bcosθ∫dA=BAcosθ | ∫BdAcosθ=Bcosθ∫dA=BAcosθ | ||
- | It will be easier to concern ourselves with this value, rather than try to describe the integral calculation each time. The bar begins moving to the left and the area begins to close up, as shown below: | + | It will be easier to concern ourselves with this value, rather than try to describe the integral calculation each time. As the bar begins moving to the left, the area within the loop begins to close up, as shown below: |
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
- | It should be easy to see the that the magnetic field and the orientation of the loop are not changing, but the area of the loop is decreasing. The flux through the loop is therefore decreasing, which indicates that a current is induced in the loop. | + | It should be easy to see the that the magnetic field and the orientation of the loop are not changing, but the area of the loop is decreasing. |
- | To determine the direction of the current, consider that when we say the flux decreases, this carries the assumption | + | To determine the direction of the induced |
- | **Step 1:** As soon as we begin to stretch out our circle, we can imagine | + | Based on Faraday' |
- | **Step 2:** As we rotate the stretched loop, notice that the area vector and magnetic field remain perfectly aligned (θ does not change). Further, | + | Alternatively, you could think of the mobile charges inside |
- | **Step 3:** As we rotate the stretched loop again, we are rotating it in such a way that the area vector also rotates. In fact, the area vector becomes less and less aligned with the magnetic field, which indicates that cosθ will be decreasing during this motion. This causes us to expect that the magnetic flux through the loop will decrease during this rotation. Alternatively, | + | [{{ 184_notes:12_rail_current.png?300 |Induced Current}}] |
- | If the loop were to continue rotating in the last step, eventually we would have zero magnetic flux, and as it rotates back around the other way, we could imagine that the flux would then be defined as " | + | {{youtube> |