Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:examples:week12_flux_examples [2017/11/12 20:56] – [Review of Flux through a Loop] tallpaul
+++ 184_notes:examples:week12_flux_examples [2018/08/09 18:08] (current) – curdemma
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[[184_notes:b_flux|Return to Changing Magnetic Flux notes]]
 ===== Review of Flux through a Loop =====
 Suppose you have a magnetic field  $\vec{B} = 0.6 \text{ mT } \hat{x}$ . Three identical square loops with side lengths  $L = 0.5 \text{ m}$  are situated as shown below. The perspective shows a side view of the square loops, so they appear very thin even though they are squares when viewed face on.
-{{ 184_notes:12_three_loops.png?600 |Square Loops in the B-field}}
+[{{ 184_notes:12_three_loops.png?600 |Square Loops in the B-field}}]
 ===Facts===
@@ Line 21: / Line 23: @@
   * We represent the situation with the given representation in the example statement above. Below, we also show a side and front view of the first loop for clarity.
-{{ 184_notes:12_first_loop.png?400 |First Loop}}
+[{{ 184_notes:12_first_loop.png?500 |First Loop}}]
 ====Solution====
 Since the magnetic field has a uniform direction, and the area of the loop is flat (meaning  $\text{d}\vec{A}$  does not change direction either), then we can simplify the dot product: