Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week14_step_down_transformer [2017/11/28 21:53] – tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week14_step_down_transformer [2021/07/22 13:56] (current) – [Solution] schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
===== Designing a Step-down Transformer ===== | ===== Designing a Step-down Transformer ===== | ||
- | Suppose you have a parallel plate capacitor that is charging with a current I=3 A. The plates | + | Recall the [[184_notes: |
- | + | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | |
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
- | * The capacitor is a parallel plate capacitor with circular plates. | + | * The high-voltage line carries |
- | * $R=10 \text{ | + | * We want the low-voltage line to carry $120 \text{ |
- | * $d=1 \text{ | + | * We know the step-up transformer was created by wrapping two solenoids around an iron ring, and connected the high-voltage line to one solenoid, and the low-voltage line to the other. |
- | * The capacitor | + | |
===Lacking=== | ===Lacking=== | ||
- | * A description of the magnetic field. | + | * We need a design for the step-down transformer. |
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * We are only concerned about a snapshot in time, so the current is I, even though this may change at a later time as the capacitor charges. | + | * We have access to the same materials |
- | * The electric field between the plates is the same as the electric field between infinite plates (we'll ignore | + | * The step-down transformer we are building will have a similar design to the step-up transformer. |
- | * The electric field outside | + | |
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
- | * We represent | + | * We represent |
- | * We can represent | + | * We can represent |
- | $$\int \vec{B}\bullet \text{d}\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{enc} + \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\text{d}\Phi_E}{\text{d}t}$$ | + | * We represent the step-up transformer, |
- | * We represent the situation | + | |
- | {{ 184_notes:14_capacitor_side_view.png?300 |Plane in which we wish to find B-field}} | + | [{{ 184_notes:week14_7.png?600 |Step-up Transformer}}] |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
- | We wish to find the magnetic field in the plane we've shown in the representations. We know from the notes that a changing electric field should create a curly magnetic field. Since the capacitor plates are charging, the electric field between the two plates will be increasing and thus create a curly magnetic field. We will think about two cases: one that looks at the magnetic field inside the capacitor and one that looks at the magnetic field outside the capacitor. | + | It makes sense intuitively |
- | + | ||
- | Due to the circular symmetry of the problem, we choose a circular loop in which to situate our integral ∫→B∙d→l. We also choose for the loop to be the perimeter of a flat surface, so that the entire thing lies in the plane of interest, and there is no enclosed current (so Ienc=0 - there is only the changing electric field). We show the drawn loop below, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Below, we also draw the direction | + | |
- | + | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | We are pretty well set up to simplify our calculation of the integral in the representations, since the B-field is parallel to the loop's perimeter. Below, we show the integral calculation, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ∫→B∙d→l=∫B(r)dl=B(r)∫dl=2πrB(r) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Next, we need to find the changing electric flux in our loop. Since our loop was described | + | |
- | $$\Phi_\text{E, in} = EA = \frac{Q/ | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
- | ΦE, out=EA=EinAin+EoutAout=Q/Aplateϵ0Aplate+0=Qϵ0πR2πR2=Qϵ0 | + | |
- | Now, if we wish the find the change | + | As with the step-up transformer, the two solenoids are wrapped around |
- | $$\frac{\text{d}\Phi_E}{\text{d}t} = \frac{\frac{\text{d}Q}{\text{d}t}r^2}{\epsilon_0 R^2} = \frac{Ir^2}{\epsilon_0 R^2} \text{, inside, } r<R$$ | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
- | dΦEdt=dQdtϵ0=Iϵ0, outside, r>R | + | |
- | We can now connect | + | The iron is able to align its atoms with the magnetic field much faster than the current alternates between directions, which is why we draw the magnetic field the same everywhere. The iron also greatly amplifies the magnetic field that the primary solenoid would produce in air, so even though |
- | $$2\pi r B(r) = \int \vec{B}\bullet \text{d}\vec{l} = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\text{d}\Phi_E}{\text{d}t} = \mu_0 \frac{Ir^2}{R^2} \text{, inside, } r<R$$ | + | Since the magnetic field in the iron ring is changing with the alternating current, |
- | $$2\pi r B(r) = \int \vec{B}\bullet \text{d}\vec{l} = \mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\text{d}\Phi_E}{\text{d}t} = \mu_0 I \text{, outside, | + | $$-V_{S}=\frac{d\Phi_{B_{S}}}{dt}$$ |
- | We are ready to write out the magnetic field. | + | The rest of our calculation follows just as it would for the [[184_notes: |
+ | ΦBS=∫→BS∙→dAS | ||
+ | where the area here would be the cross-sectional area of the iron ring (since this is where the magnetic field is). The direction of the magnetic field would always be perpendicular to the area of the cylinder - so the flux would simplfy to: | ||
+ | ΦBS=BSAS | ||
+ | But this is the magnetic flux through one loop in the secondary solenoid - if we want the total flux through all the loops then we have to multiply by the number of loops: | ||
+ | ΦBS=BSASNS | ||
+ | We can then plug this into the voltage equation we wrote above: | ||
+ | −VS=ddt(BSASNS) | ||
- | \[ | + | Since NS and AS are constant with respect to time (not adding/ |
- | B(r) = \begin{cases} | + | $$-V_{S}=N_S A_S \frac{d}{dt}\biggl(B_S\biggr)$$ |
- | | + | //__If we assume that the iron ring has a constant cross-sectional area__//, then AP=AS and we already said that BP=BS. This means we can rewrite the flux through the secondary solenoid in terms of the magnetic field and area of the primary solenoid. |
- | \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi r} &&& | + | $$-V_{S}=N_S A_P \frac{d}{dt}\biggl(B_P\biggr)$$ |
- | \end{cases} | + | |
- | \] | + | |
- | Notice, the distance between the plates has no effect on the magnetic field calculation. Also, the amount of the charge on the plates | + | If we look at the $A_P\frac{d}{dt}\biggl(B_P\biggr)$ term, this looks very much like the changing |
+ | dΦBPdt=ddt(BPAP) | ||
+ | If we use Faraday' | ||
+ | −VP=NPddt(BPAP) | ||
+ | ddt(BPAP)=−VPNP | ||
- | {{ 184_notes:14_capacitor_b_field_graph.png? | + | Finally, We can plug this result into the VS equation above to get the potential in the secondary solenoid as it relates to the potential in the primary solenoid: |
+ | $$-V_S = N_S \frac{-V_P}{N_P}$$ | ||
+ | $$V_S=V_P \frac{N_S}{N_P}$$ | ||
- | We have enough information | + | Remember, we need to step down from the $240 \text{ |
- | $$B_{\text{max}} = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2\pi R} = \frac{4\pi \cdot 10^{-7} \text{Tm/A} \cdot 3\text{ A}}{2\pi \cdot 10 \text{ m}} = 60 \text{ nT}$$ | + |