Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week14_step_down_transformer [2017/12/01 00:48] – dmcpadden | 184_notes:examples:week14_step_down_transformer [2021/07/22 13:56] (current) – [Solution] schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
===== Designing a Step-down Transformer ===== | ===== Designing a Step-down Transformer ===== | ||
Recall the [[184_notes: | Recall the [[184_notes: | ||
Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * We have access to the same materials as we did for the step-up transformer. | + | * We have access to the same materials as we did for the step-up transformer: This allows us to use some of the same relationships from the step-up transformer solution. |
* The step-down transformer we are building will have a similar design to the step-up transformer. | * The step-down transformer we are building will have a similar design to the step-up transformer. | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
* We represent the step-up transformer, | * We represent the step-up transformer, | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
It makes sense intuitively to just flip the step-up transformer for our design. If the step-up transformer brings voltage down, we could just reverse it to bring the voltage up. Our design is shown below, where **now the number of turns in the primary solenoid is much greater than the number of turns in the secondary solenoid** -- it's just the flipped step-up transformer, | It makes sense intuitively to just flip the step-up transformer for our design. If the step-up transformer brings voltage down, we could just reverse it to bring the voltage up. Our design is shown below, where **now the number of turns in the primary solenoid is much greater than the number of turns in the secondary solenoid** -- it's just the flipped step-up transformer, | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
As with the step-up transformer, | As with the step-up transformer, | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
The iron is able to align its atoms with the magnetic field much faster than the current alternates between directions, which is why we draw the magnetic field the same everywhere. The iron also greatly amplifies the magnetic field that the primary solenoid would produce in air, so even though BP contains magnetic field contributions from the primary solenoid //and// from the iron, the contribution from the iron is far greater. For this reason, we approximate the magnetic field as the same at all locations in the iron. By this approximation, | The iron is able to align its atoms with the magnetic field much faster than the current alternates between directions, which is why we draw the magnetic field the same everywhere. The iron also greatly amplifies the magnetic field that the primary solenoid would produce in air, so even though BP contains magnetic field contributions from the primary solenoid //and// from the iron, the contribution from the iron is far greater. For this reason, we approximate the magnetic field as the same at all locations in the iron. By this approximation, | ||
Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
VS=VPNSNP | VS=VPNSNP | ||
- | Remember, we need to step down from the 240 kV power line to a 120 V line. This is a factor of 2000. One way to achieve this would be to set $N_P = 10,andN_S = 20000.Duetothehugestepdown,itmaybeeveneasiertodesignaseriesofstep−downtransformers,sothatwedon′thavetohavesuchalargenumberofturnsforthesecondarysolenoid.MaybeapplyafactorofN_S/ | + | Remember, we need to step down from the 240 kV power line to a 120 V line. This is a factor of 2000. One way to achieve this would be to set $N_P = 20000,andN_S = 10.Duetothehugestepdown,itmaybeeveneasiertodesignaseriesofstep−downtransformers,sothatwedon′thavetohavesuchalargenumberofturnsforthesecondarysolenoid.MaybeapplyafactorofN_S/N_P=1/40foronetransformer,andthenN_S/N_P=1/50forasecondtransformer.Youshouldbeabletoconvinceyourselfthatthiswouldbephysicallyequivalenttojustonestep−downtransformerwithN_S/N_P=1/2000$. |