184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid [2018/02/03 20:12] – [Solution] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid [2021/05/19 15:08] (current) schram45
Line 1: Line 1:
-=====Preventing an Asteroid Collision=====+[[184_notes:pc_energy|Return to Electric Potential Energy]] 
 + 
 +=====Example: Preventing an Asteroid Collision=====
 Suppose your friend is vacationing in Italy, and she has lent you her spaceship for the weekend. You have gathered together a group of friends and you are currently cruising through the heavens together and having a great time. You are surrounded by nothingness in all directions. Suddenly, the radar starts beeping ferociously. The ship is on a collision course with an asteroid. You are not too worried about survival -- the ship is practically indestructible. However, you know your friend would be devastated if you returned her spaceship with a scratch or dent from the asteroid. You need to prevent the collision. Suppose your friend is vacationing in Italy, and she has lent you her spaceship for the weekend. You have gathered together a group of friends and you are currently cruising through the heavens together and having a great time. You are surrounded by nothingness in all directions. Suddenly, the radar starts beeping ferociously. The ship is on a collision course with an asteroid. You are not too worried about survival -- the ship is practically indestructible. However, you know your friend would be devastated if you returned her spaceship with a scratch or dent from the asteroid. You need to prevent the collision.
  
Line 17: Line 19:
   * The central component can be charged using charge from the asteroid.   * The central component can be charged using charge from the asteroid.
   * The electric potential energy of a point charge in the electric field of another point charge is Ur=14πϵ0q1q2r This was derived in the notes [[184_notes:pc_energy#General_Relationship_-_Energy_and_Force|here]].   * The electric potential energy of a point charge in the electric field of another point charge is Ur=14πϵ0q1q2r This was derived in the notes [[184_notes:pc_energy#General_Relationship_-_Energy_and_Force|here]].
 + 
 ===Goal=== ===Goal===
  * Prevent the asteroid collision using the long-distance wiring setup.  * Prevent the asteroid collision using the long-distance wiring setup.
- 
-===f=== 
-  * The current distance between the ship and the asteroid. 
-  * The distribution of charge on the asteroid. 
-  * The distribution of charge on the central component and on the ship itself. 
  
 ===Representations=== ===Representations===
Line 55: Line 52:
  
 <WRAP TIP> <WRAP TIP>
-=== Assumption ===+=== Assumptions ===
 We did not include the ship in our system. What if its energy changes due to the incoming asteroid? Well, in order to simplify problem, we will just assume its kinetic energy doesn't change. We did not include the ship in our system. What if its energy changes due to the incoming asteroid? Well, in order to simplify problem, we will just assume its kinetic energy doesn't change.
   * The ship is currently floating through space, and therefore has constant velocity.   * The ship is currently floating through space, and therefore has constant velocity.
   * The ship is far more massive than the asteroid to the degree that its current constant-velocity motion is not affected by the asteroid.   * The ship is far more massive than the asteroid to the degree that its current constant-velocity motion is not affected by the asteroid.
-Based on our representations, this seems like a reasonable assumption. Also, we are happy to make this assumption, since it is a worst-case assumption. The reason a massive ship is the worst case, is because it will not be significantly repelled by the asteroid. If our ship were tiny, we would not have to worry as much about collision, since we would move away from the asteroid just due to the repelling electric force.+Based on our representations, this seems like a reasonable assumption. Also, we are happy to make this assumption, since it is a worst-case assumption. The reason a humungous ship is the worst case, is because it will not be significantly repelled by the asteroid. If our ship were tiny, we would not have to worry as much about collision, since we would move away from the asteroid just due to the repelling electric force.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
-The change in electric potential energy will depend on how close the asteroid gets to the ship, and how we choose to charge the central component. Currently, its distance is $4000 \text{ m/s}\cdot 60 \text{ minutes/second}\cdot 10 \text{ minutes}=2.4\cdot 10^6 \text{ m}.Wealsoknowq_{comp}+q_{ast}=50 \text{ C},andwedontwanttheasteroidtoapproachthecentralcomponentatadistanceanycloserthan30 \text{ m}(thisishalfthewidthoftheship,andthedistancefromthecentralcomponenttothewall).Forsimplicityofcalculation,wellorientourcoordinatessothatthecentralcomponentisattheorigin,andtheasteroidliesonthex$-axis. We'll keep the initial and final positions of the asteroid as variables:+The change in electric potential energy will depend on how close the asteroid gets to the ship, and how we choose to charge the central component. Currently, its distance is $4000 \text{ m/s}\cdot 60 \text{ seconds/minute}\cdot 10 \text{ minutes}=2.4\cdot 10^6 \text{ m}.Wealsoknowq_{comp}+q_{ast}=50 \text{ C},andwedontwanttheasteroidtoapproachthecentralcomponentatadistanceanycloserthan30 \text{ m}(thisishalfthewidthoftheship,andthedistancefromthecentralcomponenttothewall).Forsimplicityofcalculation,wellorientourcoordinatessothatthecentralcomponentisattheorigin,andtheasteroidliesonthex$-axis. We'll keep the initial and final positions of the asteroid as variables:
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
 \Delta U &= \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{ast}q_{comp}}{x_f} - \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{ast}q_{comp}}{x_i} \\ \Delta U &= \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{ast}q_{comp}}{x_f} - \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{ast}q_{comp}}{x_i} \\
Line 81: Line 78:
 qcomp(50 Cqcomp)=50 Cqcompq2comp>530 C2 qcomp(50 Cqcomp)=50 Cqcompq2comp>530 C2
  
-A simple guess of qcomp=qast=25 C yields qcompqast=625 C2>530 C2, which is enough to save the ship from cosmetic damage. To still save the ship while charging the central component minimally, one simply needs to solve the quadratic equation based on the inequality above: 50 Cqcompq2comp=530 C2. An application of the quadratic equation or a quick query to Wolfram-Alpha gives a minimum charge of qcomp15 C, which of course means 35 C remains on the asteroid. Notice that if we transfer all the charge from the asteroid to the central component, qcompqast=0, since qast=0. If we do this, the asteroid will collide with the ship! It's worth convincing yourself that this result makes sense. \\+To still save the ship while charging the central component minimally, one simply needs to solve the quadratic equation based on the inequality above: 50 Cqcompq2comp=530 C2. An application of the quadratic formula or a quick query to Wolfram-Alpha gives a minimum charge of qcomp15 C, which means 35 C remains on the asteroid. Notice that if we transfer all the charge from the asteroid to the central component, qcompqast=0, since qast=0. If we do this, the asteroid will collide with the ship! It's worth convincing yourself that this result makes sense. \\
  
 <WRAP TIP> <WRAP TIP>
  • 184_notes/examples/week3_spaceship_asteroid.1517688741.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2018/02/03 20:12
  • by tallpaul