Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:examples:week3_superposition_three_points [2018/01/24 18:04] – [Solution] tallpaul
+++ 184_notes:examples:week3_superposition_three_points [2021/05/19 14:46] (current) – schram45
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[[184_notes:superposition|Return to superposition]]
 ===== Example: Superposition with Three Point Charges =====
 Suppose we have a distribution of point charges in a plane near a point  $P$ . There are three point charges: Charge 1 with charge  $-Q$ , a distance  $2R$  to the left of  $P$ ; Charge 2 with charge  $Q$ , a distance  $R$  above  $P$ ; and Charge 3 with charge  $Q$ , a distance  $2R$  to the right of  $P$ . Find the electric potential and the electric field at the point  $P$ .
@@ Line 13: / Line 15: @@
   * We can use superposition to add electric potential contributions from the point charges (scalar superposition):  $V_{tot}=V_1+V_2+V_3$ .
-===Goal===
+===Representations===
-  * Find the electric field and electric potential at P.
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition.png?300 |Point Charge Distribution}}]
-===Approximations & Assumptions===
+<WRAP TIP>
-  * The electric potential infinitely far away from the point charge is  $0 \text{ V}$ .
+===Assumptions===
+  * Charge is constant: Simplifies the values of each charge meaning they are not charging or discharging over time.
+  * Charges are not moving: Simplifies the separation vectors of each charge as these would be changing if the charges were moving through space.
+</WRAP>
-===Representations===
+===Goal===
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition.png?300 |Point Charge Distribution}}
+  * Find the electric field and electric potential at P.
 ====Solution====
-In this example, it makes sense to set up coordinate axes so that the  $x$ -axis stretches from left to right, and the  $y$ -axis stretches from down to up. To make it easier to discuss the example, we'll also label the point charges as Charge 1, Charge 2, and Charge 3, as shown in the diagram.
+In this example, it makes sense to set up coordinate axes so that the  $x$ -axis stretches from left to right, and the  $y$ -axis stretches from down to up. To make it easier to discuss the example, we'll also label the point charges as Charge 1, Charge 2, and Charge 3, as shown in an updated representation.
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_labels.png?400 |Point Charge Distribution with Labels}}
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_labels.png?400 |Point Charge Distribution with Labels}}]
 First, let's find the contribution from Charge 1. The separation vector  $\vec{r}_1$  points from the source to the observation ( $1\rightarrow P$ ), so  $\vec{r}_1 = 2R\hat{x}$ , and  $\hat{r_1}=\frac{\vec{r}_1}{|r_1|}=\frac{2R\hat{x}}{2R}=\hat{x}$
 Visually, this is what we know about  $\hat{r_1}$ , and what we expect for  $\vec{E}_1$ , since Charge 1 is negative:
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_1.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_1.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}]
 Now, we can find  $\vec{E}_1$  and  $V_1$ . Before we show the calculation, though, we need to make an assumption about the electric potential.
 <WRAP TIP>
@@ Line 38: / Line 43: @@
  $\vec{E}_1 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{-Q}{4R^2}\hat{x} = -\frac{1}{16\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{x}$
  $V_1 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{-Q}{2R} = -\frac{1}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}$
-These answers should make sense. We have a negative electric potential, which we would expect from a negative charge. We also found that our electric field points toward Q1, which we would again expect because Q1 is negative.
+These answers seem to make sense: We have a negative electric potential, which we would expect from a negative charge. We also found that our electric field points toward Charge 1, which we would again expect because Charge 1 is negative.
-For Charge 2, we expect the following visual to be accurate, again since $\hat{r_2}$ points from source to P, and Charge 2 is positive:
+For Charge 2, we expect the following representation to be accurate, again since the separation vector $\vec{r}_2$ points from the source to the observation ($2\rightarrow P$), and Charge 2 is positive:
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_2.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_2.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}]
-We can determine that  $\hat{r_2}=-\hat{y}$  (Pointing from Q2 to P), and
+We can see that  $\hat{r_2}=-\hat{y}$ , and
  $\vec{E}_2 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}(-\hat{y}) = -\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{y}$
  $V_2 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}$
-These answers should also make sense for a few reasons: 1) we now have a positive electric potential (coming from the positive Q2 charge), 2) the electric field points away from Q2 (which we could expect since Q2 is positive), and 3) both the magnitude of the electric field and the electric potential are larger than those from Q1, which makes sense because Q2 is closer to Point P.
+These answers should also make sense for a few reasons: 1) we now have a positive electric potential (coming from the positive Charge 2), 2) the electric field points away from Charge 2 (which we could expect since Charge 2 is positive), and 3) both the magnitude of the electric field and the electric potential are larger than those from Charge 1, which makes sense because Charge 2 is closer to Point $P$ than Charge 1 was.
-For Charge 3, we expect the following visual to be accurate, since Charge 3 is positive:
+For Charge 3, we expect the following representation to be accurate, since Charge 3 is positive:
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_3.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_3.png?400 |E-vector and r-hat for Charge 1}}]
-We can determine that  $\hat{r_3}=-\hat{x}$  (Pointing from Q3 to P), and
+We can see that  $\hat{r_3}=-\hat{x}$  (Pointing from Charge 3 to $P$), and
  $\vec{E}_3 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2}\hat{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{4R^2}(-\hat{x}) = -\frac{1}{16\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{x}$
  $V_3 = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{2R} = \frac{1}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}$
-Again, we get a positive electric potential from the positive charge (so this is good), and we get an electric field that points away from the positive charge, so this also makes sense.
+Again, we get a positive electric potential from the positive charge (so this is good), and we get an electric field that points away from the positive charge, so we are happy.
-{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_total.png?400 |E-vector superposition}}
+[{{ 184_notes:3_superposition_total.png?400 |E-vector superposition}}]
-Now that we have the individual contributions from the point charges, we can add together the potentials and use the principle of superposition to add together the electric field vectors (see above!):
+Now that we have the individual contributions from the point charges, we can use the principle of superposition to add together the electric field vectors and the electric potentials. See above the representation for superposition of electric fields.
  $\vec{E}_{tot}=\vec{E}_{1}+\vec{E}_{2}+\vec{E}_3 = -\frac{1}{16\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{x}-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{y}-\frac{1}{16\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}\hat{x} = \frac{1}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R^2}(-\hat{x}-2\hat{y})$
  $V_{tot}=V_1+V_2+V_3 = -\frac{1}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}+\frac{1}{8\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q}{R}$
-So our total electric potential is positive - this should make sense as we have two positive charges and only one negative charge, and one of the positive charges is much closer to P than the other charges so it should have a stronger effect. We found that our electric points down and to the left, which makes sense as it points away from both of the positive charges and towards the negative charge.
+So our total electric potential is positive - this should make sense as we have two positive charges and only one negative charge, and even better, one of the positive charges is much closer to $P$ than the other charges so it should have a stronger effect. We found that our electric field points down and to the left, which is away from both of the positive charges and towards the negative charge -- again consistent with what we expect.