Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week4_two_segments [2017/09/13 00:40] – [Solution] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week4_two_segments [2021/05/25 14:28] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
===== Example: Two Segments of Charge ===== | ===== Example: Two Segments of Charge ===== | ||
Suppose we have two segments of uniformly distributed charge, one with total charge +Q, the other with −Q. The two segments each have length L, and lie crossed at their endpoints in the xy-plane. The segment with charge +Q lies along the y-axis, and the segment with charge −Q lies along the x-axis. See below for a diagram of the situation. Create an expression for the electric field →EP at a point P that is located at →rP=rxˆx+ryˆy. You don't have to evaluate integrals in the expression. | Suppose we have two segments of uniformly distributed charge, one with total charge +Q, the other with −Q. The two segments each have length L, and lie crossed at their endpoints in the xy-plane. The segment with charge +Q lies along the y-axis, and the segment with charge −Q lies along the x-axis. See below for a diagram of the situation. Create an expression for the electric field →EP at a point P that is located at →rP=rxˆx+ryˆy. You don't have to evaluate integrals in the expression. | ||
- | |||
- | {{ 184_notes: | ||
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* The other segment lies on the x-axis stretching from 0 to L, with charge −Q uniformly distributed. | * The other segment lies on the x-axis stretching from 0 to L, with charge −Q uniformly distributed. | ||
* The point P is at the arbitrary location →rP=rxˆx+ryˆy | * The point P is at the arbitrary location →rP=rxˆx+ryˆy | ||
+ | * The electric field due to a point charge is →E=14πϵ0qr3→r | ||
+ | * The electric field at P is the superposition of contributions from the two segments: →EP=→E+Q+→E−Q | ||
- | ===Lacking=== | + | ===Goal=== |
- | * →EP | + | * Find →EP. |
- | + | ||
- | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | + | |
- | * The thicknesses of both segments are infinitesimally small, and we can approximate them as line segments. | + | |
- | * →EP is made up of contributions from the line segments and nothing else. | + | |
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
- | * We represent the situation using the diagram shown in the example statement. | + | {{ 184_notes:4_two_segments.png? |
- | * We represent the electric field due to a point charge as $$\vec{E} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^3}\vec{r}$$ | + | |
- | * We represent the electric field at P as the sum of contributions from the two segments: $$\vec{E}_P = \vec{E}_{+Q} +\vec{E}_{-Q}$$ | + | |
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
- | Because we know that electric fields add through superposition, | + | <WRAP TIP> |
+ | === Approximation === | ||
+ | We begin with an approximation, | ||
+ | * The thicknesses of both segments are infinitesimally small, and we can approximate them as line segments. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This example is complicated enough that it's worthwhile to make a plan. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | === Plan === | ||
+ | We will use integration to find the electric field from each segment, and then add the electric fields together using superposition. We'll go through the following steps. | ||
+ | * For the first segment, find the linear charge density, λ. | ||
+ | * Use λ to write an expression for dQ. | ||
+ | * Assign a variable location to the dQ piece, and then use that location to find the separation vector, →r. | ||
+ | * Write an expression for d→E. | ||
+ | * Figure out the bounds of the integral, and integrate to find electric field at P. | ||
+ | * Repeat the above steps for the other segment of charge. | ||
+ | * Add the two fields together to find the total electric field at P. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Because we know that electric fields add through superposition, | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | ===Assumption=== | ||
+ | The charge is evenly distributed along each segment of charge. This allows each little piece of charge to have the same value along each line. | ||
+ | </ | ||
{{ 184_notes: | {{ 184_notes: | ||
- | The separation vector →r points from the source of the electric field to the observation point. The source is dQ, | + | The separation vector →r points from the source of the electric field to the observation point. The source is dQ, |
Now, we have enough to define the electric field from the small piece (dQ) of the segment - plugging the dQ and →r we just found: d→E=14πϵ0dQr3→r=14πϵ0QdyL⋅|rxˆx+(ry−y)ˆy|3(rxˆx+(ry−y)ˆy) | Now, we have enough to define the electric field from the small piece (dQ) of the segment - plugging the dQ and →r we just found: d→E=14πϵ0dQr3→r=14πϵ0QdyL⋅|rxˆx+(ry−y)ˆy|3(rxˆx+(ry−y)ˆy) | ||
Next, we integrate over the entire segment to find an expression for its contribution to the electric field vector at P. The limits of our integral are based on the variable of integration, | Next, we integrate over the entire segment to find an expression for its contribution to the electric field vector at P. The limits of our integral are based on the variable of integration, | ||
- | $$\vec{E}_{+Q}=\int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q\text{d}y}{L\cdot|\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y}|^3}(\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y})$$ | + | $$\vec{E}_{+Q}=\int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q\text{d}y}{L\cdot|r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y}|^3}(r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y})$$ |
Next, we can do a similar analysis to find the electric field vector contribution from the segment that lies along the x-axis. See below for a visual of dQ and →r. See if you can convince yourself that for the segment along the x-axis, dQ=−QdxL, | Next, we can do a similar analysis to find the electric field vector contribution from the segment that lies along the x-axis. See below for a visual of dQ and →r. See if you can convince yourself that for the segment along the x-axis, dQ=−QdxL, | ||
Line 42: | Line 63: | ||
→E−Q=∫L014πϵ0−QdxL⋅|(rx−x)ˆx+ryˆy|3((rx−x)ˆx+ryˆy) | →E−Q=∫L014πϵ0−QdxL⋅|(rx−x)ˆx+ryˆy|3((rx−x)ˆx+ryˆy) | ||
- | Then the final electric field vector at P is the sum of the two contributions because of superpostion. (You can pull out the constants to simplify the integral if you want.) | + | Then the final electric field vector at P is the sum of the two contributions, because of vector superposition. (You can pull out the constants to simplify the integral if you want.) |
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
\vec{E} &= \vec{E}_{+Q}+\vec{E}_{-Q} \\ | \vec{E} &= \vec{E}_{+Q}+\vec{E}_{-Q} \\ | ||
- | &= \int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q\text{d}y}{L\cdot|\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y}|^3}(\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y}) + \int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{-Q\text{d}x}{L\cdot|\vec{r}_P-x\hat{x}|^3}(\vec{r}_P-x\hat{x}) \\ | + | &= \int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{Q\text{d}y}{L\cdot|r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y}|^3}(r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y}) + \int_0^L\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{-Q\text{d}x}{L\cdot|(r_x-x)\hat{x}+r_y\hat{y}|^3}((r_x-x)\hat{x}+r_y\hat{y}) \\ |
- | &= \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0L}\left(\int_0^L\frac{\text{d}y}{|\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y}|^3}(\vec{r}_P-y\hat{y}) - \int_0^L\frac{\text{d}x}{|\vec{r}_P-x\hat{x}|^3}(\vec{r}_P-x\hat{x})\right) \\ | + | &= \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0L}\left(\int_0^L\frac{\text{d}y}{|r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y}|^3}(r_x\hat{x}+(r_y-y)\hat{y}) - \int_0^L\frac{\text{d}x}{|(r_x-x)\hat{x}+r_y\hat{y}|^3}((r_x-x)\hat{x}+r_y\hat{y})\right) \\ |
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
At this point we have the integrals set up, which you could solve by hand if you so desire or plug them into Wolfram Alpha, Mathematica, | At this point we have the integrals set up, which you could solve by hand if you so desire or plug them into Wolfram Alpha, Mathematica, | ||