Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week6_charges_circuit [2017/09/26 14:50] – [Solution] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week6_charges_circuit [2021/06/08 00:41] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
=====Example: | =====Example: | ||
On the circuit shown below, draw how you would expect charge to distribute on the surface of the wire near the bends in the circuit. | On the circuit shown below, draw how you would expect charge to distribute on the surface of the wire near the bends in the circuit. | ||
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
- | * Electric field is constant in the wire. | + | * Electric field is constant in the wire - created by the surface charges on the wire, not the battery. |
* Electric field points along the direction of the wire, from positive to negative. | * Electric field points along the direction of the wire, from positive to negative. | ||
* Charges can build up on the surface of the wire. | * Charges can build up on the surface of the wire. | ||
- | ===Lacking=== | + | ===Goal=== |
- | * Charge | + | * Draw charge |
- | + | ||
- | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | + | |
- | * There are no external electric fields. | + | |
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
* We represent the circuit as in the example statement above. | * We represent the circuit as in the example statement above. | ||
* We will represent the charge distribution with little pluses (+) and minuses (−). | * We will represent the charge distribution with little pluses (+) and minuses (−). | ||
+ | |||
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | === Assumption === | ||
+ | In order to talk about individual charged particles in the circuit, we will have to make an assumption about the charged particles which are actually moving, the ones we think about when we think about " | ||
+ | * The mobile charge carriers are positive. | ||
+ | It doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will also assume that we have a perfect battery in this case to drive a steady current and provide excess charges to be distributed on the wire. | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
Note that we are only looking for the surface charges on the bends here. We need to figure out a way to distribute them so that the electric field stays constant in magnitude and along the direction of the wire. Let's consider the nature of the electric field near the positive end of the battery. In the wire, it will be pointing left into the bend. It will also have a large magnitude since it is so close to the battery. To reduce the magnitude, and ensure that the electric field points down after the bend, we place a lot of positive surface charges on the outer edge of the bend. | Note that we are only looking for the surface charges on the bends here. We need to figure out a way to distribute them so that the electric field stays constant in magnitude and along the direction of the wire. Let's consider the nature of the electric field near the positive end of the battery. In the wire, it will be pointing left into the bend. It will also have a large magnitude since it is so close to the battery. To reduce the magnitude, and ensure that the electric field points down after the bend, we place a lot of positive surface charges on the outer edge of the bend. | ||
- | What would have happened if we did not place these charges here? Conventional current would follow the electric field. An electric field vector near the bend would point left, and instead of following the wire, positive charge would build up along the outer surface of the bend (the wider part of the bend) in the wire. Charge would continue to build up until we reach a point where an electric field vector near the bend points down! See below for a picture | + | What would have happened if we did not place these charges here? Conventional current would follow the electric field. An electric field vector near the bend would point left, and instead of following the wire, positive charge would build up along the outer surface of the bend (the wider part of the bend) in the wire. Charge would continue to build up until we reach a point where an electric field vector near the bend points down! See below for a representation |
- | {{ 184_notes: | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
Notice that as you traverse the length of the wire, the surface charges become less positive and more negative, and eventually start to accumulate on the tighter part of the bend. We require each bend to be more negative than the previous one, so that the electric field on the straight parts of the wire points in the desired direction. And we start to draw the bends with negative charge on the tighter part, because all we need is for the wider part of the bend to be more positive than the tighter part. When drawing positive charge, it will be on the wider part. When drawing negative charge, it will be on the tighter part. | Notice that as you traverse the length of the wire, the surface charges become less positive and more negative, and eventually start to accumulate on the tighter part of the bend. We require each bend to be more negative than the previous one, so that the electric field on the straight parts of the wire points in the desired direction. And we start to draw the bends with negative charge on the tighter part, because all we need is for the wider part of the bend to be more positive than the tighter part. When drawing positive charge, it will be on the wider part. When drawing negative charge, it will be on the tighter part. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | === Note === | ||
+ | The accumulation of charge around the bends might look slightly different if we had chosen for the mobile charge carriers to be // | ||
+ | </ |