Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week8_resistors_parallel [2017/10/10 13:44] – created tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week8_resistors_parallel [2021/06/28 23:51] (current) – [Solution] schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | =====Example: | + | [[184_notes: |
- | Suppose you have a simple | + | |
+ | ===== Example: | ||
+ | Suppose you have the following | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
- | * $\Delta | + | * $\Delta |
- | * $R = 120 \Omega$ | + | * $I_1 = 50 \text{ mA}$ |
+ | * $R_1=80 | ||
+ | * R3=300Ω | ||
+ | * R4=500Ω | ||
+ | * $\Delta V_4=5 \text{ V}$ | ||
===Lacking=== | ===Lacking=== | ||
- | * Current | + | * ΔV1, ΔV2, ΔV3, R2. |
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the 120 Ω resistor. | + | * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the other resistors in the circuit: This allows there to be no energy loss across the wires and no potential difference across them either simplifying down the model. |
- | * The circuit is in a steady state. | + | * The circuit is in a steady state: It takes a finite amount of time for a circuit to reach steady state and set up a charge gradient. Making this assumption means the current is not changing with time in any branch of the circuit. |
- | * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery. | + | * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery: This means the battery will supply a steady power source to the circuit to keep it in steady state. |
- | * There is no outside influence on the circuit. | + | * The resistors in the circuit |
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
- | * We represent [[184_notes: | + | * We represent [[184_notes: |
- | * We represent the situation with following circuit diagram. | + | \begin{align*} |
- | + | \Delta V = IR &&&&&& | |
- | {{ 184_notes:7_ohm.png? | + | \end{align*} |
+ | * We represent the equivalent resistance of multiple resistors arranged in series as | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | R_{\text{equiv, series}} = R_1+R_2+R_3+\ldots &&&&&& | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | * We represent the equivalent resistance of multiple resistors arranged in parallel as | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{1}{R_{\text{equiv, | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | * We represent the [[184_notes:r_energy# | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \Delta V_1+\Delta V_2+\Delta V_3+\ldots = 0 &&&&&& | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | * We represent the [[184_notes: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | I_{\text{in}} = I_{\text{out}} &&&&&& | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | * We represent the situation with diagram given above. | ||
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
- | We have assumed that the battery | + | {{184_notes: |
+ | Let's start with resistance. The equivalent resistance for the entire circuit can be found with Ohm's Law -- equation (1): | ||
+ | $$R_{\text{equiv, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | We use I1 since this is the current in the wire connected directly | ||
+ | $$R_{\text{equiv, | ||
+ | This yields $R_{\text{equiv, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice | ||
+ | 1Requiv, chunk with 2,3,4=1R2+1R3+R4 | ||
+ | We can plug in what we know and solve for the resistance of Resistor 2: | ||
+ | R2=200Ω | ||
+ | |||
+ | Okay, now for the potential | ||
+ | $$I_4=\frac{\Delta | ||
+ | A simple application of Node Rule -- equation (5) -- at Node C should tell us that $I_3 = I_4$. Now, we can reapply | ||
+ | ΔV3=I3R3=I4R3=3 V | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | A couple applications of the Loop Rule should help us find the rest of the unknowns. Consider the loop highlighted in the circuit | ||
+ | $$\Delta V_{\text{bat}}-\Delta V_1 - \Delta V_3 - \Delta V_4 = 0$$ | ||
+ | We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 1: | ||
+ | $$\Delta V_1 = \Delta V_{\text{bat}}-\Delta | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | Now, consider the (different!) loop highlighted in the circuit above. The Loop Rule tells us that if we travel completely around the loop, we should encounter a total potential difference of 0. We see that current in Resistor 2 runs opposite to the current in the other resistors if we follow the loop in one direction. We have to choose a direction for the application of the Loop Rule. If we go clockwise, voltage increases across Resistor 2, but drops across Resistors 3 and 4. So we write: | ||
+ | $$\Delta V_2-\Delta V_3 - \Delta V_4 = 0$$ | ||
+ | We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 2: | ||
+ | $$\Delta V_2 = \Delta V_3+\Delta V_4 = 8 \text{ | ||
+ | One way in which we can evaluate the solution here is to pick a few other loops in the circuit and make sure they are still valid. There are often times many more loops in a circuit than the solution goes through. | ||
+ | |||
+ | That's all! Note that there are a lot of ways to do this problem, but we chose an approach that showcases the power of knowing equivalent resistance for resistors in parallel, and the power of the Loop Rule. See if you can create a different method for finding the unknowns. |