Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week8_resistors_parallel [2017/10/11 01:15] – [Solution] tallpaul | 184_notes:examples:week8_resistors_parallel [2021/06/28 23:51] (current) – [Solution] schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | =====Example: | + | [[184_notes: |
+ | |||
+ | ===== Example: Resistors in Series | ||
Suppose you have the following circuit. Resistors are labeled 1 through 4 and nodes in the circuit are labeled A, B, and C for convenience of reference. You know that the circuit contains a 12-Volt battery, I1=50 mA, R1=80Ω, R3=300Ω, R4=500Ω, and ΔV4=5 V. What are the potential differences ΔV1, ΔV2, ΔV3, and the resistance R2? | Suppose you have the following circuit. Resistors are labeled 1 through 4 and nodes in the circuit are labeled A, B, and C for convenience of reference. You know that the circuit contains a 12-Volt battery, I1=50 mA, R1=80Ω, R3=300Ω, R4=500Ω, and ΔV4=5 V. What are the potential differences ΔV1, ΔV2, ΔV3, and the resistance R2? | ||
- | {{ 184_notes:8_res_series.png?300 |Circuit with Resistors in Series}} | + | [{{ 184_notes:8_res_parallel.png?300 |Circuit with Resistors in Series |
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
Line 16: | Line 18: | ||
===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ===Approximations & Assumptions=== | ||
- | * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the other resistors in the circuit. | + | * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the other resistors in the circuit: This allows there to be no energy loss across the wires and no potential difference across them either simplifying down the model. |
- | * The circuit is in a steady state. | + | * The circuit is in a steady state: It takes a finite amount of time for a circuit to reach steady state and set up a charge gradient. Making this assumption means the current is not changing with time in any branch of the circuit. |
- | * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery. | + | * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery: This means the battery will supply a steady power source to the circuit to keep it in steady state. |
- | * The resistors in the circuit are made of Ohmic materials. | + | * The resistors in the circuit are made of Ohmic materials: Ohmic materials have a linear relationship between voltage and current, this allows us to use ohms law. |
===Representations=== | ===Representations=== | ||
Line 45: | Line 47: | ||
====Solution==== | ====Solution==== | ||
+ | {{184_notes: | ||
Let's start with resistance. The equivalent resistance for the entire circuit can be found with Ohm's Law -- equation (1): | Let's start with resistance. The equivalent resistance for the entire circuit can be found with Ohm's Law -- equation (1): | ||
Requiv, circuit=ΔVbatteryI1=240Ω | Requiv, circuit=ΔVbatteryI1=240Ω | ||
+ | {{ 184_notes: | ||
We use I1 since this is the current in the wire connected directly to the battery. We can break this down further to find the equivalent resistance in the chunk of the circuit containing Resistors 2, 3, and 4. This chunk and Resistor 1 are connected in series to form the resistance of the whole circuit, so we can use equation (2) to write: | We use I1 since this is the current in the wire connected directly to the battery. We can break this down further to find the equivalent resistance in the chunk of the circuit containing Resistors 2, 3, and 4. This chunk and Resistor 1 are connected in series to form the resistance of the whole circuit, so we can use equation (2) to write: | ||
Requiv, circuit=R1+Requiv, chunk with 2,3,4 | Requiv, circuit=R1+Requiv, chunk with 2,3,4 | ||
Line 61: | Line 65: | ||
A simple application of Node Rule -- equation (5) -- at Node C should tell us that I3=I4. Now, we can reapply Ohm's Law to find the potential difference across Resistor 3: | A simple application of Node Rule -- equation (5) -- at Node C should tell us that I3=I4. Now, we can reapply Ohm's Law to find the potential difference across Resistor 3: | ||
ΔV3=I3R3=I4R3=3 V | ΔV3=I3R3=I4R3=3 V | ||
- | A couple applications of the Loop Rule should help us find the rest of the unknowns. Consider the loop highlighted in the circuit | + | |
+ | [{{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | A couple applications of the Loop Rule should help us find the rest of the unknowns. Consider the loop highlighted in the circuit | ||
ΔVbat−ΔV1−ΔV3−ΔV4=0 | ΔVbat−ΔV1−ΔV3−ΔV4=0 | ||
We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 1: | We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 1: | ||
ΔV1=ΔVbat−ΔV3−ΔV4=4 V | ΔV1=ΔVbat−ΔV3−ΔV4=4 V | ||
- | Now, consider the (different!) loop highlighted in the circuit | + | [{{ 184_notes: |
+ | Now, consider the (different!) loop highlighted in the circuit | ||
ΔV2−ΔV3−ΔV4=0 | ΔV2−ΔV3−ΔV4=0 | ||
We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 2: | We know enough potential differences to find the voltage across Resistor 2: | ||
ΔV2=ΔV3+ΔV4=8 V | ΔV2=ΔV3+ΔV4=8 V | ||
+ | One way in which we can evaluate the solution here is to pick a few other loops in the circuit and make sure they are still valid. There are often times many more loops in a circuit than the solution goes through. | ||
+ | |||
That's all! Note that there are a lot of ways to do this problem, but we chose an approach that showcases the power of knowing equivalent resistance for resistors in parallel, and the power of the Loop Rule. See if you can create a different method for finding the unknowns. | That's all! Note that there are a lot of ways to do this problem, but we chose an approach that showcases the power of knowing equivalent resistance for resistors in parallel, and the power of the Loop Rule. See if you can create a different method for finding the unknowns. |