Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:examples:week8_wheatstone [2017/10/12 11:48] – [Solution (Part B)] tallpaul
+++ 184_notes:examples:week8_wheatstone [2021/07/22 18:28] (current) – schram45
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+[[184_notes:combinations|Return to Larger Combinations of Resistors and Capacitors notes]]
 ===== The Wheatstone Bridge =====
 Suppose you have the following circuit -- it is similar to a well known circuit called [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheatstone_bridge|a Wheatstone bridge]]. Resistors are labeled 1 through 4 for convenience of reference, and the fifth element is a light bulb, which also has some resistance. If any current at all flows through the light bulb, it will glow. You know  $R_1 = 150 \Omega$ ,  $R_2=60 \Omega$ , and  $R_3$  is variable, meaning you can choose its resistance. **Part A:** You find that when  $R_3=250 \Omega$ , the light bulb is off. What is  $R_4$ ? **Part B:** Suppose we set  $R_3=500 \Omega$ , so that the light bulb glows. We also have the new information that  $\Delta V_{\text{bat}} = 20 \text{ V}$ , and  $\Delta V_3 = 15 \text{ V}$ . Which direction does conventional current flow through the light bulb? What is the voltage across the light bulb?
-{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone.png?300 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge}}
+[{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone.png?300 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge}}]
 ===Facts===
@@ Line 17: / Line 19: @@
 ===Approximations & Assumptions===
-  * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the other resistors in the circuit.
+  * The resistors (including the light bulb) in the circuit are made of Ohmic materials: Ohmic materials have a linear relationship between voltage and current, this allows us to use ohms law.
-  * The circuit is in a steady state.
+  * The wire has very very small resistance when compared to the other resistors in the circuit: This allows there to be no energy loss across the wires and no potential difference across them either simplifying down the model.
-  * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery.
+  * The circuit is in a steady state: It takes a finite amount of time for a circuit to reach steady state and set up a charge gradient. Making this assumption means the current is not changing with time in any branch of the circuit.
-  * The resistors (including the light bulb) in the circuit are made of Ohmic materials.
+  * Approximating the battery as a mechanical battery: This means the battery will supply a steady power source to the circuit to keep it in steady state.
 ===Representations===
   * We represent [[184_notes:resistivity#Resistance|Ohm's Law]] as
@@ Line 36: / Line 37: @@
 \Delta V_1 = \Delta V_2, &&&&& \Delta V_3 = \Delta V_4
 \end{align*}
+Here are the loops:
-{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_small_loops.png?300 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge and highlighted loops}}
+[{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_small_loops.png?600 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge and highlighted loops}}]
 A simple application of Ohm's Law changes these equations into
@@ Line 44: / Line 46: @@
 I_3 R_3 = I_4 R_4 &&&&& (2)
 \end{align*}
-We can refer again to there being no current in the light bulb to say more about the current in the rest of the circuit. Since there is no current in that segment, we can use the Node Rule on Nodes A and B to say  $I_1=I_3$  and  $I_2=I_4$ , respectively. When we plug this into the equation (2), we can find that  $R_4 = \frac{I_1}{I_2}R_3$
+We can refer again to there being no current in the light bulb to say more about the current in the rest of the circuit. Since there is no current in that segment, we can use the Node Rule on Nodes C and D to say  $I_1=I_3$  and  $I_2=I_4$ , respectively. When we plug this into the equation (2), we can find that  $R_4 = \frac{I_1}{I_2}R_3$
 It remains to determine the ratio between the two currents. To do this we simply rearrange equation (1) to express the ratio as being between resistors rather than currents. This gives us a final expression for  $R_4$ :
  $R_4 = \frac{R_2}{R_1}R_3 = 100 \Omega$
@@ Line 53: / Line 55: @@
 The direction of current shouldn't be terribly hard to figure out. If current is directed to the left, it should then add via the Node Rule to the current directed down through Resistor 3. If current is directed to the right, it should then add via the Node Rule to the current directed down through Resistor 4. Before we changed  $R_3$ , current was zero. Now, we have increased  $R_3$ . We can imagine that with the increased resistance, current in Resistor 3 should decrease, so it makes sense for current to directed to the right. One could think of this result both as less current in Resistor 3, or more current in Resistor 4. There are also a lot of other arguments that would reach this same conclusion. For clearness, we have drawn the direction of conventional current in each segment below.
-{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_current_directions.png?300 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge, and directed current}}
+[{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_current_directions.png?300 |Circuit with Wheatstone bridge, and directed current}}]
-To find  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$ , we will need to set up some equations using the Loop Rule and Node Rule. We will focus on Nodes C and D, and the Loops highlighted below.
+To find  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$ , we will need to set up some equations using the Loop Rule and Node Rule. We will focus on Nodes A and B, and the Loops highlighted below. Note that if you want to be able to solve for everything in the circuit, you have to use some loop equations and some node equations (you can't use only loop or only nodes).
-{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_loops.png?300 |Highlighted loops in Wheatstone bridge circuit}}
+[{{ 184_notes:8_wheatstone_loops.png?900 |Highlighted loops in Wheatstone bridge circuit}}]
 Applying the Node Rule and the Loop Rule, we obtain the following equations:
 \begin{align*}
-  I &= I_1 + I_2 &(\text{Node C}) \\
+  I &= I_1 + I_2 &(\text{Node A}) \\
-  I &= I_3 + I_4 &(\text{Node D}) \\
+  I &= I_3 + I_4 &(\text{Node B}) \\
   \Delta V_{\text{bat}} &= \Delta V_1 + \Delta V_3 &(\text{Loop 1}) \\
   \Delta V_{\text{bat}} &= \Delta V_2 - \Delta V_{\text{light}} + \Delta V_3 &(\text{Loop 2}) \\
   \Delta V_{\text{light}} + \Delta V_4 &= \Delta V_3 &(\text{Loop 3})
 \end{align*}
-If we combine the equations from Nodes C and D, and apply Ohm's Law, our resistances come into play, which we know. After applying Ohm's Law, what we have is:
+If we set the equations from Nodes C and D equal to one another then we find:
+ $I_1 + I_2=I=I_3+I_4$
+Then, we apply Ohm's Law  $I=\frac{\Delta V}{R}$ , so our resistances come into play, which we know. After applying Ohm's Law, what we have is:
  $\frac{\Delta V_1}{R_1} + \frac{\Delta V_2}{R_2} = \frac{\Delta V_3}{R_3} + \frac{\Delta V_4}{R_4}$
-Ultimately, we wish to express  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$  in terms of our known resistances, and  $\Delta V_{\text{bat}}$  and  $\Delta V_3$ . We need to figure out a way to sub in for the unknowns  $\Delta V_1$ ,  $\Delta V_2$ , and  $\Delta V_4$  in terms of our known constants. Our approach, which is not the only way to solve this problem, just solve the chosen system of equations above.
+Ultimately, we wish to express  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$  in terms of our known resistances, and  $\Delta V_{\text{bat}}$  and  $\Delta V_3$ . We need to figure out a way to sub in for the unknowns  $\Delta V_1$ ,  $\Delta V_2$ , and  $\Delta V_4$  in terms of our known constants. Our approach (which is not the only way to solve this problem) will be to solve the chosen system of equations above.
-First, we use the equations from Loops 1 and 3 to rewrite our most recent result:
+First, we will use Loops 1 to solve for  $\Delta V_1$  and we will use Loop 3 to solve for  $\Delta V_4$ . Then we can rewrite our most recent result:
  $\frac{\Delta V_{\text{bat}} - \Delta V_3}{R_1} + \frac{\Delta V_2}{R_2} = \frac{\Delta V_3}{R_3} + \frac{\Delta V_3 - \Delta V_{\text{light}}}{R_4}$
-We can also use the result from Loop 2 to sub in for  $\Delta V_2$ :
+We can also use the equation from Loop 2 to sub in for  $\Delta V_2$ :
  $\frac{\Delta V_{\text{bat}} - \Delta V_3}{R_1} + \frac{\Delta V_{\text{bat}} + \Delta V_{\text{light}} - \Delta V_3}{R_2} = \frac{\Delta V_3}{R_3} + \frac{\Delta V_3 - \Delta V_{\text{light}}}{R_4}$
-It remains to rearrange and solve for  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$ :
+Since we know  $\Delta V_3$  and all the resistances, all that remains is to rearrange and solve for  $\Delta V_{\text{light}}$ :
- $\Delta V_{\text{light}} = \frac{\Delta V_3\left(\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} + \frac{1}{R_4}\right) - \Delta V_{\text{bat}}\left(\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}\right)}{\frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_4}}$
+$$\Delta V_{\text{light}} = \frac{\Delta V_3\left(\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_3} + \frac{1}{R_4}\right) - \Delta V_{\text{bat}}\left(\frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2}\right)}{\frac{1}{R_2} + \frac{1}{R_4}} = 2.37 \text{ V}$$
+Looking at loop 2 alone between the power source and resistor 3 we would expect the voltage across any other elements in that loop to be small. Our answer agrees with this observation as 2.37 is quite small compared to both the battery and resistor 3.