Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
184_notes:extra_sup [2018/01/12 02:10] – created dmcpadden | 184_notes:extra_sup [2018/01/19 00:50] (current) – dmcpadden | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | === More than two charges | + | ===== Dipole Superposition Example |
+ | [[184_notes: | ||
- | If you have more than two point charges, you can still use the same process to find the electric force. Suppose you have a third positive charge in between | + | === Electric Field between |
- | {{ 184_notes:dipoleandcharge.png}} | + | {{ 184_notes:dipolepointp.png}} |
+ | |||
+ | We will start by finding the net electric field at the location of Point P (shown in the figure to the right) using superposition. Here we have P positioned a height h above the two charges in the dipole and centered between the positive and negative charge horizontally. From the superposition principle, we know that the total electric field at Point P (→Enet) should be equal to the electric field from the positive charge at Point P (→E+) plus the electric field from the negative charge at Point P (→E−): | ||
- | We start by finding the net electric field at the location of q3 using superposition, | ||
→Enet=→E++→E− | →Enet=→E++→E− | ||
- | The electric field from the positive charge is given by: | + | First, we will find the electric field from the positive charge, which is given by: |
- | $$ E_{+}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{+}}{(r_{+ \rightarrow | + | $$ E_{+}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{+}}{(r_{+ \rightarrow |
- | where $\vec{r}_{+ \rightarrow | + | where $\vec{r}_{+ \rightarrow |
- | $$r_{+ \rightarrow | + | $$r_{+ \rightarrow |
So this means that →E+ is given by: | So this means that →E+ is given by: | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
Similarly, we can find the electric field from the negative charge: | Similarly, we can find the electric field from the negative charge: | ||
- | $$ E_{-}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{-}}{(r_{- \rightarrow | + | $$ E_{-}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_{-}}{(r_{- \rightarrow |
- | where $\vec{r}_{- \rightarrow | + | where $\vec{r}_{- \rightarrow |
- | $$r_{- \rightarrow | + | $$r_{- \rightarrow |
So this means that →E− is given by: | So this means that →E− is given by: | ||
E−=14πϵ0q−(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | E−=14πϵ0q−(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | ||
- | So the net electric field is given by: | + | The net electric field is then found by adding the two electric fields together: |
→Enet=14πϵ0q+(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d/2,h,0⟩+14πϵ0q−(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | →Enet=14πϵ0q+(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d/2,h,0⟩+14πϵ0q−(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | ||
If we //__assume the dipole charges are equal in magnitude__// | If we //__assume the dipole charges are equal in magnitude__// | ||
→Enet=+14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d/2,h,0⟩−14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | →Enet=+14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d/2,h,0⟩−14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨−d/2,h,0⟩ | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can simplify the math some to find the general equation for the electric field between the two charges: | ||
→Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3(⟨d/2,h,0⟩−⟨−d/2,h,0⟩) | →Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3(⟨d/2,h,0⟩−⟨−d/2,h,0⟩) | ||
Line 36: | Line 40: | ||
→Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | →Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
- | So this is the net electric field at q3 from both the positive and negative dipole charges. | + | So this final result |
- | $$\vec{F}_{q_3}=q_3\vec{E}_{net}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_3*q}{(\sqrt{(d/ | + | |
- | This force only points in the ˆx direction, which makes sense. Because q3 is positive, we know that it should be repelled from the positive charge and attracted toward the negative charge. As much as the positive charge wants to push it away, the negative charge wants to pull it back so there is no change in the ˆy direction, but both charges want to send q3 to the right. | + | === Electric Field far away from a Dipole === |
- | + | ||
- | === General | + | |
{{ 184_notes: | {{ 184_notes: | ||
- | Since dipoles occur frequently in nature (we can model any atom as dipole), it is often useful to have simplified equation for the electric field of a dipole. | + | Since dipoles occur frequently in nature (we can model any atom as dipole), it is often useful to have simplified equation for the electric field of a dipole. |
→Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | →Enet=14πϵ0q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
- | Now if we //__assume that we are really far away from the dipole__//, then this would mean that h is much much larger than the separation of d. This allows us to simplify the denominator. If h>>d, | + | Now if we //__assume that we are really far away from the dipole__//, then this would mean that h is much much larger than the separation of d. This allows us to simplify the denominator. If h>>d, |
(d/2)2+h2≈h2 | (d/2)2+h2≈h2 | ||
- | Using this with our electric field equation gives: | + | Using this with our electric field equation gives a simplified answer of: |
→Enet≈14πϵ0q(√(h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | →Enet≈14πϵ0q(√(h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
→Enet≈14πϵ0qh3⟨d,0,0⟩ | →Enet≈14πϵ0qh3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
Note, //this electric field equation is only true for points far away from the dipole and perpendicular to the dipole axis// | Note, //this electric field equation is only true for points far away from the dipole and perpendicular to the dipole axis// | ||
- | {{184_notes: | + | === Electric Field on Axis of the Dipole === |
+ | {{ 184_notes: | ||
We could also follow a similar process to find the electric field for points far away but on the same axis as the dipole. This would consist of finding the electric field from both the positive and negative charge, adding those fields together through superposition, | We could also follow a similar process to find the electric field for points far away but on the same axis as the dipole. This would consist of finding the electric field from both the positive and negative charge, adding those fields together through superposition, | ||
Line 62: | Line 64: | ||
Note this is only the magnitude of the electric field. The direction depends on which side of the dipole you are considering. (If you are closer to the negative charge, the electric field will point toward the negative charge. If you are closer to the positive charge, the electric field will point away from the positive charge.) | Note this is only the magnitude of the electric field. The direction depends on which side of the dipole you are considering. (If you are closer to the negative charge, the electric field will point toward the negative charge. If you are closer to the positive charge, the electric field will point away from the positive charge.) | ||
+ | ==== Finding the force from the dipole ==== | ||
+ | Once we have the electric field from the dipole, it becomes relatively simple to find the force from that dipole on any other charge that we would have near by simply by using the electric force relationship: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ 184_notes: | ||
+ | |||
+ | For example, if we had a positive charge q3 that was centered a distance h above our dipole (as in the first example), we could find the force on q3 by using the electric field that we calculated before: | ||
+ | →Fq3=q3→Enet=14πϵ0q3∗q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This force only points in the ˆx direction, which makes sense. Because q3 is positive, we know that it should be repelled from the positive charge and attracted toward the negative charge. As much as the positive charge wants to push it away, the negative charge wants to pull it back so there is no change in the ˆy direction, but both charges want to send q3 to the right. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If q3 happened to be negative, then the force would instead point to left (but we would not have to rewrite →Enet because we didn't change anything about the dipole): | ||
+ | →Fq3=−q3→Enet=14πϵ0−q3∗q(√(d/2)2+h2)3⟨d,0,0⟩ | ||
+ | This is often why we care about the electric field - **it doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Superposition of Potential and Energy ==== | ||
+ | We could have also done the same procedure for finding the total electric potential at Point P rather than finding the electric field - find the electric potential at Point P from the positive charge, find the electric potential at Point P from the negative charge and add them together to get Vtot. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Once you have the total electric potential around the dipole, it is then very easy to find the electric potential energy between a third charge (q3) and the dipole: | ||
+ | U=q3Vtot | ||
+ | Again, this is often why we care about the electric potential - **it doesn' |