Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 184_notes:pc_potential [2018/05/24 13:54] – dmcpadden
+++ 184_notes:pc_potential [2021/01/26 19:17] (current) – [Potential vs Distance Graphs] bartonmo
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Some of Sections 16.3, 16.5, and 16.7 in Matter and Interactions (4th edition)
-[[184_notes:pc_efield|Previous Page: Electric Field]]
+/*[[184_notes:relating_ev|Next Page: Relating Electric Potential to Electric Field]]
+[[184_notes:pc_efield|Previous Page: Electric Field]]*/
 ===== Electric Potential of a Point Charge =====
@@ Line 15: / Line 17: @@
 **Electric potential** is a //scalar// field that gives you an idea of the energy landscape that the electric field produces. Think of this analogy - positive charges make hills and negative charges make valleys in the energy landscape. The electric potential is like a [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topographic_map|topographic map]] of the space surrounding the charges in question. Even though they are named similarly, **electric potential is not the same thing as electric potential energy** (we will relate electric potential to [[184_notes:pc_energy|electric potential energy]] soon). Just like we did with electric field, we will start by making a //__point particle assumption__// to create a simplest model.
-Electric potential can be quite useful because it is a scalar field -- a single number at each point in space characterizes the electric potential. This makes using electric potential a bit easier compared to electric field because it is a scalar quantity (we don't have to worry about a direction). Moreover, you already have some experience with electric potential (or voltage as it is often referred to), which might not be the case for electric field. For example, most batteries have an electric potential (technically, an electric potential difference - more on this later) of 1.5 volts (volts is the unit of electric potential) while your wall outlet is closer to 120 volts. You can probably see that there's something about electric potential that is already suggestive of energy - you can power a TV or a vacuum with the wall outlet, but not a battery.
+Electric potential can be quite useful because it is a scalar field -- a single number at each point in space characterizes the electric potential. This makes using electric potential a bit easier compared to electric field because it is a scalar quantity (we don't have to worry about a direction). Moreover, you already have some experience with electric potential (or "voltage" as it is often referred to), which might not be the case for electric field. For example, most batteries have an electric potential (technically, an electric potential difference - [[184_notes:batteries|more on this later]]) of 1.5 volts (volts is the unit of electric potential) while your wall outlet is closer to 120 volts. You can probably see that there's something about electric potential that is already suggestive of energy - you can power a TV or a vacuum with the wall outlet, but not a battery.
 ==== Equation for Electric Potential of a Point Charge ====
-Electric potential is usually represented with a "V." The general equation for electric potential from a point charge at some location (Point P) is given by:
+Electric potential is usually represented with the variable "V." The general equation for electric potential from a point charge at some location (Point P) is given by:
  $V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r}$
 Because potential is a scalar, it is usually easier to represent mathematically and has fewer parts to it - many of which are found in the electric field equation:
-  * **Charge** - the variable q represents the charge that is creating the potential (this is exactly the same as with electric field). q is a scalar number with units of coulombs (C) that can be positive or negative depending on the sign of the charge. q is directly proportional to electric potential - //the bigger the charge, the large the electric potential//.
+  * **Charge** - the variable q represents the charge that is creating the potential (this is exactly the same as with electric field). q is a scalar number with units of coulombs (C) that can be positive or negative depending on the sign of the charge. q is directly proportional to electric potential - //the bigger the charge, the larger the electric potential//.
   * **Constant** - the constant of  $\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}$  is exactly the same as the constant in electric field, where  $\epsilon_0 = 8.85\cdot10^{-12} \frac{C^2}{N m^2}$ .
   * **Distance** - r is the scalar distance between the point charge and the location where you want to know the electric potential (Point P in this case). Mathematically, you can calculate r from the individual positions of the charge and point or from the separation vector that points from the charge to the Point P.  $r=|\vec{r}|=|\vec{r_p}-\vec{r_q}|$
@@ Line 34: / Line 36: @@
 ==== Potential vs Distance Graphs ====
-[{{  184_notes:potentialgraph.png?250|Electric Potential vs Distance}}]
+[{{  184_notes:potentialgraph.png?250|Electric Potential ( v ) vs Distance ( r ) graph}}]
-Because electric potential is a scalar, it is generally easier graph than electric field is. In general, we will still specify a path and graph the electric potential along that path because when you have multiple charges, the electric potential does not necessarily take on the same value or change in the same way in all directions. For a single positive point charge, if we pick a path along any direction moving away from the point charge, we will get the potential vs distance graph that is shown to the right. From the  $V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r}$  equation, we get a graph that looks very similar to a  $y=\frac{1}{x}$  graph. This graph tells us that the closer you get to the point charge, the higher the electric potential; whereas, the only time the electric potential is zero is when  $r=\infty$ .
+Because electric potential is a scalar, it is generally easier to graph than electric field is. Typically, we will still specify a path and graph the electric potential along that path because when you have multiple charges, the electric potential does not necessarily take on the same value or change in the same way in all directions. For a single positive point charge, if we pick a path along any direction moving away from the point charge, we will get the potential vs distance graph that is shown to the right. From the  $V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r}$  equation, we get a graph that looks very similar to a  $y=\frac{1}{x}$  graph. This graph tells us that the closer you get to the point charge, the higher the electric potential; whereas, the only time the electric potential is zero is when  $r=\infty$ .
-[{{184_notes:positivepoint3dcontour.jpg?200|3D electric potential  }}]
+[{{184_notes:positivepoint3dcontour.jpg?200|3D electric potential graph  }}]
 If we wanted to see what the electric potential looks like everywhere around the charge, we could create a 3D topographical map, where the x and y axes show the space around the charge and the z axis shows the electric potential. For a positive point charge, this would look similar to a "hill", going back the energy landscape analogy. This is shown in the figure to the left. [[184_notes:examples:Week2_potential_plots|The final example]] shows the source code in mathematica that we used to create this plot - you can plug this code into Wolfram Alpha and change the variables or rotate the plot. What would it look like if the charge were negative instead of positive?
-==== Relating Electric Potential to Electric Field ====
-{{youtube>cAE3Ad5J3J4?large}}
-At this point you may have noticed some similarities between electric field and electric potential.
-  * They use the same constant
-  * They both relate to the amount of charge you have
-  * They both get smaller when you increase the distance from the charge
-  * Neither describes an interaction (both are only based on a single charge)
-However, there are differences between these quantities.
-  * Electric field is a vector and electric potential is a scalar
-  * Electric field relates to force and electric potential relates to energy
-  * Electric field depends on  $\frac{1}{r^2}$  and electric potential depends on  $\frac{1}{r}$
-So while these are two distinct quantities, it makes sense for them to be related somehow. When you look at the equations side-by-side, you see that they appear to be different by a factor of r; however, it is not quite as simple as multiplying/dividing by r, especially since we need to be able to turn a vector quantity into a scalar quantity and vice versa.
- $V=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r}$   $\vec{E}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q}{r^2} \hat{r}$
-=== Getting Electric Field from Electric Potential ===
-If we know what the electric potential in terms of r, you can calculate the electric field by taking the negative derivative of potential with respect to r, which will give you the electric field in the  $\hat{r}$  direction. //__This assumes that your electric potential equation does not depend on an angle__//. (If your electric potential does depend on an angle, then you have to use the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient|gradient]].)
- $\vec{E}=-\frac{dV}{dr}\hat{r}$
-If you know the electric potential in terms of x,y, and z variables, you can calculate the electric field by taking the negative derivative with respect to each direction (this is the [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient|gradient]] in cartesian coordinates).
- $\vec{E}=-\frac{dV}{dx}\hat{x}-\frac{dV}{dy}\hat{y}-\frac{dV}{dz}\hat{z}=-\left\langle \frac{dV}{dx},\frac{dV}{dy},\frac{dV}{dz} \right\rangle$
-=== Getting Electric Potential from Electric Field ===
-If instead you start with the electric field and want to get the electric potential, we do the inverse operation: take the negative integral over a path. By integrating over a path (which has direction), we can use a [[184_notes:math_review#Vector Multiplication|dot product]] between the electric field and a small position vector to get the scalar voltage. If you use an indefinite integral, you have to add a constant to the integral (which you can solve for if you know the voltage a certain point - usually you set the voltage to be zero at infinity)
- $V=-\int \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r} + C$
-or if you take a definite integral, than you are really finding a change in voltage from some initial location to some final location:
- $\Delta V=V_f-V_i=-\int_{r_i}^{r_f} \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r}$
-This relationship between field and potential is very similar to the relationship between [[183_notes:force_and_pe|force and potential energy]] (for good reason, as we will talk about next week).
-[{{  184_notes:evrelation.png|Relationship between E-field and Potential  }}]
 ==== Examples ====