Example: Sledding
A little girl is riding her sled on a hill. If she starts a distance d up the hill, which makes an angle θ with the horizontal, how far will she travel along the flat snowy ground?
Facts
Child on incline of θ.
The total mass of the sled and child = m.
There's a small bit of friction between the rails of the sled and the snow = (μ_k).
Slope length = L
Initial state: at rest, at height above horizontal
Final state: at rest on horizontal
Lacking
How far will she travel along the flat?
Approximations & Assumptions
Coefficient for kinetic friction for flat + incline is the same.
No wind resistance.
Representations
Solution
We could solve this using forces of kinematics; but, let's apply the energy principle because we can avoid vector quantities in the calculation.
First we must decide the system and surroundings.
System: Sled+Kid+Earth Surroundings: Snow
Starting with the principle that change in energy in the system is equal to the work done by the surroundings.
ΔEsystem=Wsurroundings
The change in energy can be in the form of change of kinetic and change in gravitational potential energy.
ΔK+ΔUg=Wfriction
No change ΔK=0
ΔUg=Wfriction⟶Wfriction?
Here, we pause because we have two different regions to consider.
The frictional force is different in the two regions so we must consider the work they do separately.
ΔUg=W1+W2
Breaking work down into force by change in distance.
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2
→r2 is what we are trying to solve for as this is the position change along flat part.
What's f1 and f2?
Need to find f1 & f2
To find F1 we can say that the sum of the forces in the x direction are equal to ma1 But we don't need this because we know that f1=μkN.
∑Fx=f1−mgsinθ=ma1
The sum of the forces in the y direction we do need because this allows us to express N.
∑Fy=N−mgcosθ=0
mgcosθ=N
If f1=μkN then:
f1=μkmgcosθ
To find f2 we must do the same thing and add all the forces in the x and y directions. Again because not using kinematics we don't need accelerations and instead want an equation that expresses f2.
∑Fx=f2=ma2⟶f2=μkN=μkmg
∑Fy=N−mg=0
We substitute in for f1, f2 and d the distance down the slope into the previous equation for gravitational potential energy with minuses on the →f′s as they are in opposition of the →r′s.
ΔUg=→f1⋅Δ→r1+→f2⋅Δ→r2
In the previous equation →f1⋅Δ→r1⟶W1<0 and →f2⋅Δ→r2⟶W2<0 because →f's are opposite to Δ→r's
ΔUg=−(μkmgcosθ)d−(μkmg)x
Substitute in the equation for gravitational potential energy for ΔUg
+mg(yf−yi)=−μkmgdcosθ−μkmgx
Rearrange to get the following expression.
yf−yi=−μk(dcosθ+x)
What is yf−yi in terms of what we know? Eventually we want to express x in terms of variables we know.
From the diagram of the incline we get:
yf−yi=−dsinθ
Substitue −dsinθ for yf−yi and then rearrange to express x in terms of known variables.
−dsinθ=−μk(dcosθ+x)
dcosθ+x=dμksinθ
x=dμksinθ−dcosθ
x=d(sinθ−μkcosθμk)
A check of the units reveals that:
[x]=m
[d]=m
Which makes sense as all the other quantities are unit less.
E=γmc2