Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
183_projects:problem5_fall2021_b [2021/10/07 14:11] – pwirving | 183_projects:problem5_fall2021_b [2022/02/10 15:21] (current) – pwirving | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{183_projects: | {{183_projects: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
====== Project 5: Part B: CSI East Lansing Part 1 ====== | ====== Project 5: Part B: CSI East Lansing Part 1 ====== | ||
Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
You are a group of scientists who are a member of an elite crime scene investigation unit who focus on traffic accidents. You have been called to the scene of an accident between two cars. Your initial assessment allows you to come to the conclusion that one of the cars has obviously run into the back of the other. Your team finds brake marks on the road. After examining the scene of the accident you conclude that one of the cars, a Volkswagen New Beetle was parked with its handbrake on and only the driver in it before the accident, while the other car, an Audi tt had a single male occupant (33 years old) who crashed into the back of the Beetle. | You are a group of scientists who are a member of an elite crime scene investigation unit who focus on traffic accidents. You have been called to the scene of an accident between two cars. Your initial assessment allows you to come to the conclusion that one of the cars has obviously run into the back of the other. Your team finds brake marks on the road. After examining the scene of the accident you conclude that one of the cars, a Volkswagen New Beetle was parked with its handbrake on and only the driver in it before the accident, while the other car, an Audi tt had a single male occupant (33 years old) who crashed into the back of the Beetle. | ||
- | ====== Project 5: Part C: CSI East Lansing Part 3 ====== | + | ====== Project 5: Part C: CSI East Lansing Part 2 ====== |
The Audi TT drivers lawyer feels as if they have come up with a foolproof scientific argument as to why their client was speeding. They indicate that the car was actually traveling up an incline of 8 degrees when it started breaking. You have been brought in as an expert witness to indicate whether this is true or not. | The Audi TT drivers lawyer feels as if they have come up with a foolproof scientific argument as to why their client was speeding. They indicate that the car was actually traveling up an incline of 8 degrees when it started breaking. You have been brought in as an expert witness to indicate whether this is true or not. | ||
Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
- | ====== Project 5: Part D: CSI East Lansing Part 4 ====== | + | ====== Project 5: Part D: CSI East Lansing Part 3 ====== |
[{{ 183_projects: | [{{ 183_projects: |