184_notes:examples:week3_particle_in_field

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week3_particle_in_field [2018/01/24 23:10] – [Solution] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week3_particle_in_field [2021/05/19 15:01] (current) schram45
Line 1: Line 1:
-=====Particle Acceleration through an Electric Field=====+[[184_notes:pc_energy|Return to Electric Potential Energy]] 
 + 
 +=====Example: Particle Acceleration through an Electric Field=====
 Suppose you have a particle with a mass $m$, charge $Q$, initially at rest in an electric field $\vec{E}=E_0\hat{x}$. The electric field extends for a distance $L$ in the $+\hat{x}$-direction before dropping off abruptly to 0. So, the magnitude of the electric field is exactly $E_0$, and then exactly $0$. There is no in-between. What happens to the particle if $Q>0$? What if $Q<0$? What if $Q=0$? In one of these cases, the particle exits the electric field. What is its velocity when it reaches the region of zero electric field? Suppose you have a particle with a mass $m$, charge $Q$, initially at rest in an electric field $\vec{E}=E_0\hat{x}$. The electric field extends for a distance $L$ in the $+\hat{x}$-direction before dropping off abruptly to 0. So, the magnitude of the electric field is exactly $E_0$, and then exactly $0$. There is no in-between. What happens to the particle if $Q>0$? What if $Q<0$? What if $Q=0$? In one of these cases, the particle exits the electric field. What is its velocity when it reaches the region of zero electric field?
  
Line 7: Line 9:
   * It has charge $Q$, which can be positive or negative or zero.   * It has charge $Q$, which can be positive or negative or zero.
   * The particle is a distance $L$ from the boundary of the electric field.   * The particle is a distance $L$ from the boundary of the electric field.
-  * We can write the change in electric potential energy (from an initial location "i" to a final location "f") for a point charge two ways here:+  * We can write the change in electric potential energy (from an initial location "$i$" to a final location "$f$") for a point charge two ways here:
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
 \Delta U &= -\int_i^f\vec{F}\bullet d\vec{r} &&&&&& (1) \\ \Delta U &= -\int_i^f\vec{F}\bullet d\vec{r} &&&&&& (1) \\
 \Delta U &= q\Delta V                        &&&&&& (2) \Delta U &= q\Delta V                        &&&&&& (2)
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
-  * We can write the change in electric potential (from an initial location "i" to a final location "f") as+  * We can write the change in electric potential (from an initial location "$i$" to a final location "$f$") as
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
 \Delta V=-\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r} &&&&&& (3) \Delta V=-\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r} &&&&&& (3)
Line 22: Line 24:
  
 ===Representations=== ===Representations===
-{{ 184_notes:3_particle_acceleration_field.png?200 |Particle in the Electric Field}}+[{{ 184_notes:3_particle_acceleration_field.png?200 |Particle in the Electric Field}}
 + 
 +<WRAP TIP> 
 +===Assumption=== 
 +No gravitational effects are being considered in this problem. Typically point charges are really small and have negligible masses. This means that the gravitational force would be very small compared to the electric force acting on the particle in the accelerator and can be excluded from the calculations and representation. 
 +</WRAP>
  
 ===Goal=== ===Goal===
Line 31: Line 38:
 <WRAP TIP> <WRAP TIP>
 === Approximation === === Approximation ===
-We will approximate the particle as a point charge. We already know it is a "particle" which is a pretty small thing, so our approximation seems reasonable. We want to make this approximation because it allows us to use certain tools, like the equation for electric force in the Facts, tools that can only be applied to point charges.+We will approximate the particle as a //__point charge__//. We already know it is a "particle" which is a pretty small thing, so our approximation seems reasonable. We want to make this approximation because it allows us to use certain tools, like the equation for electric force in the Facts, tools that can only be applied to point charges.
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
  
Line 40: Line 47:
 Okay, so now the only thing we need to find is the velocity of the particle ($Q>0$) when it reaches the boundary of the electric field. Where can we start? Let's break down what is happening to the particle. It starts from rest. Since it has charge, and the electric field at its location is nonzero, it feels an electric force. The force acts on the particle, and the particle accelerates. When it leaves the electric field, its acceleration drops to zero, so it is moving at constant velocity. Okay, so now the only thing we need to find is the velocity of the particle ($Q>0$) when it reaches the boundary of the electric field. Where can we start? Let's break down what is happening to the particle. It starts from rest. Since it has charge, and the electric field at its location is nonzero, it feels an electric force. The force acts on the particle, and the particle accelerates. When it leaves the electric field, its acceleration drops to zero, so it is moving at constant velocity.
  
-It would be easy to find the electric force (like we did above), but it's not obvious how we'd find out the amount of time the particle spends in the electric field. We would need to know the timing in order to use force to find the change in momentum ($\vec{F}=\Delta \vec{p}/\Delta t$). So we won't try to go down that road. We could also find the velocity if we knew the kinetic energy. As it turns out, there is a way to set up a conservation-of-energy-type solution...+It would be easy to find the electric force (like we did above), but it's not obvious how we'd find out the amount of time the particle spends in the electric field. We would need to know the timing in order to use force to find the change in momentum ($\vec{F}=\Delta \vec{p}/\Delta t$). So we won't try to go down that road. Alternatively, we could find the velocity if we knew the kinetic energy. As it turns out, there is a way to set up a conservation-of-energy-type solution...
  
-We have listed two representations (Equations (1) and (2)) for the electric potential energy. You can check for yourself that both lead us to the following equation (using Equations (3) and (4)): $$\Delta U=-q\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r}$$+<WRAP TIP> 
 +=== Plan === 
 +We will use conservation of energy to find the final velocity of the particle. We'll go through the following steps. 
 +  * Our system will be the single particle. 
 +  * The initial state is when the particle is at rest in the electric field. 
 +  * The final state is when the particle exits the electric field. 
 +  * We expect the system to experience a decrease in electric potential energy, and an equivalent increase in kinetic energy. 
 +  * We can use the new kinetic energy to find the corresponding velocity. 
 +</WRAP>
  
-We choose the path of integration to start at the current location of the particle, and end at place where the particle exits the electric field. Based on our assumptions, the particle will follow a straight line in the $+x$-direction (when $Q>0$, as explained earlier). So we can set $d\vec{r}=\hat{x}dx$. We also need to define the path endpoints, so we'll say the particle starts at $x_i=x_0$, which means the integration will end at $x_f=x_0+L$. You'll see that it won't matter in the end what $x_0$ is, since it drops out. In fact, it is common to set $x_0=0$, for simplicity of calculation. In this example, we'll leave it as $x_0$.+We have listed two expressions (Equations (1) and (2)) for the electric potential energy of the particle. You can check for yourself that both lead us to the following equation (using Equations (3) and (4)): $$\Delta U=-q\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r}$$ 
 + 
 +We choose the path of integration to start at the current location of the particle, and end at place where the particle exits the electric field, as outlined in the Plan. The particle will follow a straight line in the $+x$-direction (when $Q>0$, as explained earlier). So we can set $\text{d}\vec{r}=\text{d}x \cdot \hat{x}$. We also need to define the path endpoints, so we'll say the particle starts at $x_i=x_0$, which means the integration will end at $x_f=x_0+L$. You'll see that it won't matter in the end what $x_0$ is, since it drops out. In fact, it is common to set $x_0=0$, for simplicity of calculation. In this example, we'll leave it as $x_0$.
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
-\Delta U &= -q\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet d\vec{r} \\ +\Delta U &= -q\int_i^f \vec{E}\bullet \text{d}\vec{r} \\ 
-         &= -Q\int_{x_0}^{x_0+L} E_0\hat{x}\bullet \hat{x}dx \\ +         &= -Q\int_{x_0}^{x_0+L} E_0\text{d}x (\hat{x}\bullet \hat{x}\\ 
-         &= -QE_0\int_{x_0}^{x_0+L} dx \\+         &= -QE_0\int_{x_0}^{x_0+L} \text{d}x \\
          &= \left.-QE_0x\right|_{x_0}^{x_0+L} \\          &= \left.-QE_0x\right|_{x_0}^{x_0+L} \\
          &= -QE_0(x_0+L-x_0) \\          &= -QE_0(x_0+L-x_0) \\
          &= -QE_0L          &= -QE_0L
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
-The physical significance of this result is that the particle "loses" $QE_0L$ of electric potential energy as it travels through the electric field. We do not transfer any energy to the surroundings (through heat, friction, etc.), so this "lost" potential energy must have just been converted to kinetic energy. $$0=\Delta E_{\text{sys}}=\Delta U+\Delta K=-QE_0L+\frac{1}{2}M(v_f^2-v_i^2)$$+ 
 +<WRAP TIP> 
 +===Assumption=== 
 +Assuming the electric field is constant within the accelerator allows the $E_0$ to be taken out of the integral in this problem. 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
 +The physical significance of this result is that the particle "loses" $QE_0L$ of electric potential energy as it travels through the electric field. We do not transfer any energy to the surroundings (through heat, friction, etc.), so this "lost" potential energy must have just been converted to kinetic energy. $$0=\Delta E_{\text{sys}}=\Delta U+\Delta K=-QE_0L+\frac{1}{2}m(v_f^2-v_i^2)$$ 
 + 
 +<WRAP TIP> 
 +===Assumption=== 
 +Assuming there is a conservation of energy allows the total change in energy of the system to be zero. 
 +</WRAP> 
 Remember that $\vec{v}_i=0$, so we can solve for the unknown $\vec{v}_f$: Remember that $\vec{v}_i=0$, so we can solve for the unknown $\vec{v}_f$:
 \begin{align*} \begin{align*}
-                     & 0=-QE_0L+\frac{1}{2}M(v_f^2-0) \\ +                     & 0=-QE_0L+\frac{1}{2}m(v_f^2-0) \\ 
-\Rightarrow \text{ } & QE_0L=\frac{1}{2}Mv_f^2 \\ +\Rightarrow \text{ } & QE_0L=\frac{1}{2}mv_f^2 \\ 
-\Rightarrow \text{ } & \frac{2QE_0L}{M}=v_f^2+\Rightarrow \text{ } & \frac{2QE_0L}{m}=v_f^2
 \end{align*} \end{align*}
 We reasoned earlier that the particle will be traveling in the $+x$-direction, so the final velocity will be We reasoned earlier that the particle will be traveling in the $+x$-direction, so the final velocity will be
-$$\vec{v}_f=\sqrt{\frac{2QE_0L}{M}}\hat{x}$$+$$\vec{v}_f=\sqrt{\frac{2QE_0L}{m}}\hat{x}$$
  
  • 184_notes/examples/week3_particle_in_field.1516835441.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2018/01/24 23:10
  • by tallpaul