184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid [2021/05/19 14:37] schram45184_notes:examples:week3_spaceship_asteroid [2021/05/19 15:08] (current) schram45
Line 19: Line 19:
   * The central component can be charged using charge from the asteroid.   * The central component can be charged using charge from the asteroid.
   * The electric potential energy of a point charge in the electric field of another point charge is $$U_r=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_1q_2}{r}$$ This was derived in the notes [[184_notes:pc_energy#General_Relationship_-_Energy_and_Force|here]].   * The electric potential energy of a point charge in the electric field of another point charge is $$U_r=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_1q_2}{r}$$ This was derived in the notes [[184_notes:pc_energy#General_Relationship_-_Energy_and_Force|here]].
- 
-===Assumptions=== 
-  * Asteroid and Central Component are point charges: The asteroid and central component are relatively small compared to the ship. This allows us to use the electric potential energy equation derived in the notes. 
-  * Asteroid is going straight towards the central component: This simplifies the separation vector as both the point charges are in line with each other. 
-  * Ship is a rectangle: Creates a simplified model for the ship, and is a worse case scenario for the ship shape. 
    
 ===Goal=== ===Goal===
  • 184_notes/examples/week3_spaceship_asteroid.1621435028.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2021/05/19 14:37
  • by schram45