Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:examples:week4_charge_ring [2018/06/05 14:24] – curdemma | 184_notes:examples:week4_charge_ring [2021/05/25 14:38] (current) – schram45 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
We begin with an approximation, | We begin with an approximation, | ||
* The thickness of the ring is infinitesimally small, and we can approximate it as a circle. | * The thickness of the ring is infinitesimally small, and we can approximate it as a circle. | ||
+ | * The ring is in a perfect circle. | ||
</ | </ | ||
We also make a plan to tackle the integrating, | We also make a plan to tackle the integrating, | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
So the $\text{d}Q$ in our representation takes up a small angle out of the whole circle, which we can call $\text{d}\phi$. The length of our $\text{d}Q$ is therefore $R\text{d}\phi$ (which comes from the [[https:// | So the $\text{d}Q$ in our representation takes up a small angle out of the whole circle, which we can call $\text{d}\phi$. The length of our $\text{d}Q$ is therefore $R\text{d}\phi$ (which comes from the [[https:// | ||
$$\text{d}Q=\lambda\text{d}l=\frac{Q}{2\pi R}R\text{d}\phi=\frac{Q\text{d}\phi}{2\pi}$$ | $$\text{d}Q=\lambda\text{d}l=\frac{Q}{2\pi R}R\text{d}\phi=\frac{Q\text{d}\phi}{2\pi}$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP TIP> | ||
+ | ===Assumption=== | ||
+ | The charge is evenly distributed along the ring. This also assumes the ring is a perfect conductor where charges will distribute evenly along the conductor. If this were not true, the charge density along the ring would not be constant. | ||
+ | </ | ||
To find an expression for $\vec{r}$, we can also consult the representation. $\vec{r}$ points from the location of $\text{d}Q$ to the point $P$. The location of $\text{d}Q$ is $\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=R\hat{s}$. This unit vector $\hat{s}$ may be unfamiliar, since we are used to working in Cartesian coordinates. $\hat{s}$ is the unit vector that points along the radius of a cylinder centered on the $z$-axis in our cylindrical coordinate system. In fact, $\hat{s}$ actually depends on $\phi$, and is more appropriately written as a function in terms of $\phi$, or $\hat{s}(\phi)$. We do not acknowledge the $\phi$-dependence in some of our expressions here, because as you will soon see, all terms containing $\hat{s}$ will disappear. | To find an expression for $\vec{r}$, we can also consult the representation. $\vec{r}$ points from the location of $\text{d}Q$ to the point $P$. The location of $\text{d}Q$ is $\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=R\hat{s}$. This unit vector $\hat{s}$ may be unfamiliar, since we are used to working in Cartesian coordinates. $\hat{s}$ is the unit vector that points along the radius of a cylinder centered on the $z$-axis in our cylindrical coordinate system. In fact, $\hat{s}$ actually depends on $\phi$, and is more appropriately written as a function in terms of $\phi$, or $\hat{s}(\phi)$. We do not acknowledge the $\phi$-dependence in some of our expressions here, because as you will soon see, all terms containing $\hat{s}$ will disappear. |