184_notes:examples:week4_tilted_segment

This is an old revision of the document!


Suppose we have a segment of uniformly distributed charge stretching from the point $\langle 0,0,0 \rangle$ to $\langle 1 \text{ m}, 1 \text{ m}, 0 \rangle$, which has total charge $Q$. We also have a point $P=\langle 2 \text{ m},0,0 \rangle$. Define a convenient $\text{d}Q$ for the segment, and $\vec{r}$ between a point on the segment to the point $P$. Also, give appropriate limits on an integration over $\text{d}Q$ (you don't have to write any integrals, just give appropriate start and end points). First, do this for the given coordinate axes. Second, define a new set of coordinate axes to represent $\text{d}Q$ and $\vec{r}$ in a simpler way and redo.

Facts

  • The segment stretches from $\langle 0,0,0 \rangle$ to $\langle 1 \text{ m}, 1 \text{ m}, 0 \rangle$.
  • The segment has a charge $Q$, which is uniformly distributed.
  • $P=\langle 2 \text{ m},0,0 \rangle$.

Lacking

  • $\text{d}Q$ and $\vec{r}$
  • A new set of coordinate axes

Approximations & Assumptions

  • The thickness of the segment is infinitesimally small, and we can approximate it as a line segment.
  • The total charge is a constant - not discharging.

Representations

  • For the first part, we can draw a set of coordinate axes using what we already know. The first part of the example involves the following orientation:

Axes with Tilted Segment

  • We can represent $\text{d}Q$ and $\vec{r}$ for our line as follows:

Tilted Segment dQ Representation

  • For the second part when we define a new set of coordinate axes, it makes sense to line up the segment along an axis. We choose the $y$-axis. We could have chosen the $x$-axis, and arrived at a very similar answer. Whichever you like is fine!

Tilted Segment with New Axes

FIXME Some note about picking dx instead of dy is completely arbitrary

In the first set of axes, the segment extends in the $x$ and $y$ directions. A simple calculation of the Pythagorean theorem tells us the total length of the segment is $\sqrt{2}$, so we can define the line charge density $\lambda=Q/\sqrt{2}$. When we define $\text{d}l$, we want it align with the segment, so we can have $\text{d}l=\sqrt{\text{d}x^2+\text{d}y^2}$. Since $x=y$ along the segment, we can simplify a little bit. $\text{d}l=\sqrt{\text{d}x^2+\text{d}x^2}=\sqrt{2}\text{d}x$. Now, we can write an expression for $\text{d}Q$: $$\text{d}Q=\lambda\text{d}l=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{2}}Q\text{d}x=Q\text{d}x$$ FIXME This is a little funky - the units look weird here because one of $\sqrt{2}$'s that cancelled out had units and one did not. It might make sense to try to track the units more closely.

The units here might look a little weird, since distance was defined without dimensions in the example statement. Next, we need $\vec{r}$. We will put it in terms of $x$, not $y$, just as we did for $\text{d}Q$. FIXME (Note that while the initial variable picking was arbitrary we now have to match) We know $\vec{r}_P=\langle 2,0,0 \rangle$, and $\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=\langle x, y, 0 \rangle$. Again, $x=y$, so we can rewrite $\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=\langle x, x, 0 \rangle$. We now have enough to write $\vec{r}$: $$\vec{r}=\vec{r}_P-\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=\langle 2-x, -x, 0 \rangle$$ Because we picked dx and x as our variable, we are all set up to integrate over $x$. This means that our limits of integration also have to match the total length that we want to add up in terms of the x variable, which goes from $0$ to $1$. So our limits of integration would be from $0$ to $1$.


In the second set of axes, the segment extends only in the $y$ direction. This problem is now very similar to the examples in the notes. The length of the segment is still $\sqrt{2}$, so we can define the line charge density $\lambda=Q/\sqrt{2}$. When we define $\text{d}l$, we want it align with the segment, which is much simpler this time: $\text{d}l=\text{d}y$. Now, we can write an expression for $\text{d}Q$: $$\text{d}Q=\lambda\text{d}l=\frac{Q\text{d}y}{\sqrt{2}}$$ Next, we need $\vec{r}$. We will put it in terms of $y$, just as we did for $\text{d}Q$. The location of $P$ is a little different with this new set of axes. Now, we have $\vec{r}_P=\langle \sqrt{2},\sqrt{2},0 \rangle$, and $\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=\langle 0, y, 0 \rangle$. We have enough to write $\vec{r}$: $$\vec{r}=\vec{r}_P-\vec{r}_{\text{d}Q}=\langle \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{2}-y, 0 \rangle$$ FIXME (Match similar wording to that above.) An integration would occur over $y$, which goes from $0$ to $\sqrt{2}$. These would be our limits of integration.

  • 184_notes/examples/week4_tilted_segment.1505259333.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2017/09/12 23:35
  • by tallpaul