184_notes:examples:week5_flux_cylinder

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
184_notes:examples:week5_flux_cylinder [2017/09/24 18:57] – [Solution] tallpaul184_notes:examples:week5_flux_cylinder [2018/07/24 14:52] (current) – curdemma
Line 1: Line 1:
 +[[184_notes:e_flux|Return to Electric Flux and Area Vectors notes]]
 +
 ===== Example: Flux through a Closed Cylinder ===== ===== Example: Flux through a Closed Cylinder =====
 A constant electric field $\vec{E}$ is directed along the $x$-axis. If we imagine a cylindrical surface with radius $R$ and height $h$ is situated in the field so that the bases of the cylinder are parallel to the $xz$-plane. What is the electric flux through the cylinder? A constant electric field $\vec{E}$ is directed along the $x$-axis. If we imagine a cylindrical surface with radius $R$ and height $h$ is situated in the field so that the bases of the cylinder are parallel to the $xz$-plane. What is the electric flux through the cylinder?
Line 20: Line 22:
 $$\Phi=\vec{E}\bullet \vec{A}$$ $$\Phi=\vec{E}\bullet \vec{A}$$
   * We represent the situation with the following diagram:   * We represent the situation with the following diagram:
-{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder.png?300 |Cylinder}}+[{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder.png?300 |Cylinder}}]
 ====Solution==== ====Solution====
 Before we dive into the math, let's reason about the nature of the situation. It will be helpful to visualize how the area vector $\text{d}\vec{A}$ would look for different parts of the cylinder's surface. Here is a visual from a couple perspectives, where each arrow represents the direction of $\text{d}\vec{A}$ at its location. Remember that the convention for closed surfaces is that area-vectors are directed outside. Before we dive into the math, let's reason about the nature of the situation. It will be helpful to visualize how the area vector $\text{d}\vec{A}$ would look for different parts of the cylinder's surface. Here is a visual from a couple perspectives, where each arrow represents the direction of $\text{d}\vec{A}$ at its location. Remember that the convention for closed surfaces is that area-vectors are directed outside.
-{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder_da.png?650 |Cylinder Area-Vectors}}+[{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder_da.png?650 |Cylinder Area-Vectors}}]
 Notice that the area vectors on the bases of the cylinder are pointing along the $y$-axis. Since the electric field is aligned with the $x$ axis, there will be no flux through the top and bottom of the cylinder. The math is here: Notice that the area vectors on the bases of the cylinder are pointing along the $y$-axis. Since the electric field is aligned with the $x$ axis, there will be no flux through the top and bottom of the cylinder. The math is here:
 $$\Phi_{\text{top}}=\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{top}}=(E\hat{x})\bullet(\pi R^2\hat{y})=0$$ $$\Phi_{\text{top}}=\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{top}}=(E\hat{x})\bullet(\pi R^2\hat{y})=0$$
Line 29: Line 31:
 $$\Phi_{\text{bottom}}=\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{bottom}}=(E\hat{x})\bullet(\pi R^2(-\hat{y}))=0$$ $$\Phi_{\text{bottom}}=\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{bottom}}=(E\hat{x})\bullet(\pi R^2(-\hat{y}))=0$$
 The wall of the cylinder is not so easy. Before we set up some nasty integral, consider the symmetry of the cylinder. For every tiny piece of the wall, there another tiny piece directly opposite, which will have the opposite area-vector. See below for a visual. The wall of the cylinder is not so easy. Before we set up some nasty integral, consider the symmetry of the cylinder. For every tiny piece of the wall, there another tiny piece directly opposite, which will have the opposite area-vector. See below for a visual.
-{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder_cancel.png?300 |Opposite Area-Vectors}}+[{{ 184_notes:5_cylinder_cancel.png?300 |Opposite Area-Vectors}}]
 If we were to calculate the electric flux through the cylinder's wall, we could set it up like a sum over all the little pieces of area that add up to the entire wall. If we were to calculate the electric flux through the cylinder's wall, we could set it up like a sum over all the little pieces of area that add up to the entire wall.
 $$\Phi_{\text{wall}}=\sum_{\text{entire wall}}\Phi_{\text{little piece}}=\sum_{\text{entire wall}}\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{little piece}}$$ $$\Phi_{\text{wall}}=\sum_{\text{entire wall}}\Phi_{\text{little piece}}=\sum_{\text{entire wall}}\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_{\text{little piece}}$$
  
 Each little piece will have a "matching piece", like $\vec{A}_1$ and $\vec{A}_2$ in the figure. Since area-vectors point out of the surface, matching pieces will be opposites: $\vec{A}_1 = - \vec{A}_2$. Since the electric field is constant everywhere, we find that the fluxes are also opposites: Each little piece will have a "matching piece", like $\vec{A}_1$ and $\vec{A}_2$ in the figure. Since area-vectors point out of the surface, matching pieces will be opposites: $\vec{A}_1 = - \vec{A}_2$. Since the electric field is constant everywhere, we find that the fluxes are also opposites:
-$$\Phi_1 = \vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_1 = E\hat{x}\bullet\vec{A}_1 = E\cdot(\hat{x}\bullet\vec{A}_1) = E\cdot(\hat{x}\bullet-\vec{A}_2)$$+$$\Phi_{A_1} = \vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_1 = E\cdot(\hat{x}\bullet\vec{A}_1) = E\cdot(\hat{x}\bullet-\vec{A}_2) = -\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_2 = -\Phi_{A_2}$$
  
-Within the sum, we can match up the little pieces of area with their opposites (like $\vec{A}_1$ and $\vec{A}_2$ in the figure). It shouldn't be too surprising at this point to see that everything cancels out. When we match up the terms, we get something like: +It shouldn't be too surprising at this point to see that everything cancels out. When we match up the terms, we get: 
-$$\Phi_{\text{matching pieces}}=\Phi_{A_1}+\Phi_{A_2} = \vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_1+\vec{E}\bullet\vec{A}_2 = \vec{E}\bullet(\vec{A}_1+\vec{A}_2)=\vec{E}\bullet(0)=0$$+$$\Phi_{\text{matching pieces}}=\Phi_{A_1}+\Phi_{A_2} = 0$$
 We can continue in the manner for the entire wall, and we will find that We can continue in the manner for the entire wall, and we will find that
 $$\Phi_{\text{wall}}=0$$ $$\Phi_{\text{wall}}=0$$
 In total, In total,
 $$\Phi_{\text{cylinder}}=\Phi_{\text{top}}+\Phi_{\text{bottom}}+\Phi_{\text{wall}}=0$$ $$\Phi_{\text{cylinder}}=\Phi_{\text{top}}+\Phi_{\text{bottom}}+\Phi_{\text{wall}}=0$$
  • 184_notes/examples/week5_flux_cylinder.1506279431.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2017/09/24 18:57
  • by tallpaul