Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
184_notes:amp_law [2017/10/05 00:45] – created caballero | 184_notes:amp_law [2020/08/24 13:29] (current) – dmcpadden | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ===== Putting Ampere' | + | Section 21.6 in Matter and Interactions (4th edition) |
- | Now, that we have built the two sides of the equation let's review and put everything together to find the magnetic field outside of a long straight wire. This model of a long straight wire is usually pretty good for many situations where you want to determine the magnetic field near the wire. When you start to get farther from it, the ends of the wire become problematic and we might have to develop a new model. | + | / |
- | ==== Outside a long straight wire ==== | + | ===== Putting Ampere' |
- | Consider | + | Now, that we have built the two sides of Ampere' |
- | FIXME add figure | + | ==== Magnetic Field Outside a Long Straight Wire ==== |
- | === Left-hand side === | + | The last step here is to piece together the left and right sides of Ampere' |
- | As we have argued, the magnetic field curls around the wire. So long as the wire has a uniform steady current, that magnitude of that magnetic field will constant at any fixed distance from the wire. This lead us to derive the left-hand side of Ampere' | + | $$\oint \vec{B} \bullet d\vec{l} = \mu_0 I_{enc}$$ |
- | $$\oint \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = B \oint dl = B 2\pi R.$$ | + | [{{ |
- | For the purposes of this page, we will assume | + | For the left hand side, we argued the magnetic field curls around the wire. So long as the wire has a uniform steady current, |
- | === Right-hand side === | + | $$\oint \vec{B} \bullet d\vec{l} |
- | Given that our Amperian loop is larger | + | where we said that R is greater |
- | $$mu_0 I_{enc} = \mu_0 I_{tot}.$$ | + | For the right hand side then, our Amperian loop is larger than the radius of the wire, so the total enclosed current is just $I_{tot}$. This leaves the left hand side of Ampere' |
- | === Put it together === | + | $$\mu_0 I_{enc} |
Combining the two sides of Ampere' | Combining the two sides of Ampere' | ||
- | $$\oint \mathbf{B} \cdot d\mathbf{l} = mu_0 I_{enc}$$ | + | $$\oint \vec{B} \bullet |
B∮dl=μ0Itot | B∮dl=μ0Itot | ||
B2πR=μ0Itot | B2πR=μ0Itot | ||
B=μ0Itot2πR | B=μ0Itot2πR | ||
- | This is exactly the result we obtained with Biot-Savart for a very long wire, but by doing a much more complicated integral. | + | This is [[184_notes: |
- | + | ||
- | What happens inside the wire? That is the subject of the example below. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === Example === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * Magnetic field inside a wire | + | |
+ | The final step here is to ask what is the direction of this B-field? With Ampere' | ||
+ | ==== Ampere' | ||
+ | There are a few cases (besides outside a long wire) where Ampere' | ||
+ | - Figure out and draw the general shape of the magnetic field. | ||
+ | - Choose an Amperian loop that a) goes through your observation point, b) follows the magnetic field (to simplify the dot product) and c) has a constant magnetic field along the length of the loop (to pull the B out of the integral). This lets you simplify the left side of the integral. | ||
+ | - Find the current enclosed by the loop (maybe using current density if you need a fraction of the total current). | ||
+ | - Solve for the magnitude of the magnetic field | ||
+ | - Double check the direction of the magnetic field using the right hand rule. |